首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Accreditation/Performance assessment on-site reviews in Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, and Washington: implications for States and an evolving national model.
【24h】

Accreditation/Performance assessment on-site reviews in Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, and Washington: implications for States and an evolving national model.

机译:密歇根州,密苏里州,北卡罗来纳州和华盛顿州的认证/绩效评估现场审查:对国家的影响和不断发展的国家模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1988, the Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health identified the core functions of assessment, policy development, and assurance as key roles of the public health governmental sector. Some states have developed accreditation or performance assessment programs to measure how state and/or local government carry out these functions. Several of these programs share a common "on-site review" component defined as a site-specific visit to assess, observe, interview, review, evaluate, and/or survey a local/state agency or program regarding its ability to meet a set of public health standards. This article describes the experience of four states-Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, and Washington-in developing and conducting on-site reviews for accreditation or performance assessment.
机译:1988年,公共卫生未来研究委员会将评估,政策制定和保证的核心职能确定为公共卫生政府部门的关键角色。一些州制定了认证或绩效评估计划,以衡量州和/或地方政府如何执行这些职能。这些程序中有几个共享一个共同的“现场审查”组件,该组件被定义为针对特定站点的访问,以评估,观察,采访,审查,评估和/或调查本地/州机构或程序是否符合特定要求。公共卫生标准。本文介绍了密歇根州,密苏里州,北卡罗来纳州和华盛顿州这四个州在开发和进行现场评审以进行认证或绩效评估方面的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号