首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Balancing fidelity and adaptation: implementing evidence-based chronic disease prevention programs.
【24h】

Balancing fidelity and adaptation: implementing evidence-based chronic disease prevention programs.

机译:保真与适应之间的平衡:实施基于证据的慢性病预防计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

: To describe adaptations that community-based organizations (CBOs) made to evidence-based chronic disease prevention intervention programs and to discuss reasons for those adaptations.: The process evaluation used project report forms, interviews, and focus groups to obtain information from organizational staff.: Programs were conducted in community-based organizations (n = 12) in rural southwest Georgia including churches, worksites, community coalitions, a senior center, and a clinical patient setting.: Site coordinators (n = 15), organizational leaders (n = 7), and project committee members (n = 25) involved in program implementation at 12 funded organizations.: The Emory Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network awarded mini grants to rural CBOs to implement one of 5 evidence-based nutrition or physical activity programs. These sites received funding and technical assistance from Emory and agreed to conduct all required elements of the selected evidence-based program.: Program implementation and context were explored, including completion of core elements, program adaptation, and reasons for adaptation that occurred at sites implementing evidence-based chronic disease prevention programs.: Five major types of adaptations were observed: changing educational materials, intended audience, and program delivery; adding new activities; and deleting core elements. Sites had intentional or unintentional reasons for making program adaptations including enhancing engagement in the program, reaching specific audiences, increasing program fit, and reinforcing program messages. Reasons for not completing core elements (program deletions) included various types of "turbulence" or competing demands (eg, leadership/staff transitions and time constraints).: The types of adaptations and reasons described in this evaluation support the idea that adaptation is a natural element of implementing evidence-based interventions. Building this understanding into dissemination strategies may help researchers and funders better reach communities with evidence-based interventions that are a relevant fit, while striving for fidelity.
机译::描述社区组织(CBO)对基于证据的慢性病预防干预计划所做的调整,并讨论进行这些调整的原因。:过程评估使用项目报告表,访谈和焦点小组从组织人员那里获取信息。:计划在乔治亚州西南农村的社区组织(n = 12)中进行,包括教堂,工作场所,社区联盟,高级中心和临床患者设置。:现场协调员(n = 15),组织负责人(n = 7),项目委员会成员(n = 25)参与了12个受资助组织的计划实施。:Emory癌症预防和控制研究网络向农村CBO提供了小额赠款,以实施5个基于证据的营养或体育锻炼计划之一。这些站点获得了Emory的资金和技术援助,并同意执行选定的基于证据的计划的所有必需要素。:探讨了计划的实施和背景,包括核心要素的完成,计划的调整以及实施地点发生的调整的原因以证据为基础的慢性病预防计划。:观察到了五种主要的适应方法:不断变化的教学资料,预定的听众和计划的交付;增加新的活动;并删除核心元素。网站有进行计划改编的有意或无意的原因,包括加强对计划的参与,吸引特定受众,增加计划的适用性以及加强计划的信息。未完成核心要素(计划删除)的原因包括各种类型的“动荡”或竞争性需求(例如领导/人员过渡和时间限制)。:适应类型和本评估中描述的原因支持适应是一种实施循证干预的自然要素。将这种理解纳入传播策略中,可以帮助研究人员和资助者通过以证据为基础的干预措施更好地覆盖社区,同时努力保真。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号