首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Applying the model for improvement in a local health department: quality improvement as an effective approach in navigating the changing landscape of public health practice in Buncombe County, North Carolina.
【24h】

Applying the model for improvement in a local health department: quality improvement as an effective approach in navigating the changing landscape of public health practice in Buncombe County, North Carolina.

机译:在地方卫生部门中应用改进模型:在北卡罗莱纳州邦科姆县,质量改进是一种有效的方法,可以应对不断变化的公共卫生实践。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In local health departments across the nation, problem solving and rapid change occur every day. Often, the results of these changes or problem-solving techniques may not be studied or evaluated fully to determine whether desired results were achieved. In fact, program evaluation, research, and technical assistance at the local level may be reduced or eliminated in many states during a time of rapidly diminishing resources and increasing demand for public health services. In delivering population-level programs, quality improvement (QI) methods may provide a much-needed alternative and more efficient approach than traditional research and evaluation to help answer public health practice questions such as "How do we know when a project or program really works, and, more importantly, how can we do it better?" This article focuses on the Buncombe County Department of Health's (BCDH's) experience utilizing a QI approach called the model for improvement (MFI), incorporating plan-do-study-act cycles and small tests of change, on a specific H1N1 influenza-awareness public health preparedness communication project. In addition, results of the BCDH's participation in QI initiatives and training resulted in success implementing change in other areas of the health department including decreasing wait time and addressing a backlog of prenatal visit appointments from 54 to 15 days, and more than doubling prenatal history efficiency uptake in a 5-week period. These case studies in the BCDH present how the MFI introduced the foundation of a culture of continuous QI within the organization.
机译:全国各地的卫生部门每天都在解决问题和迅速变化。通常,可能无法研究或评估这些更改或解决问题技术的结果,以确定是否实现了所需的结果。实际上,在资源迅速减少和对公共卫生服务的需求增加的时候,许多州可能会减少或取消地方一级的计划评估,研究和技术援助。与传统的研究和评估相比,质量改进(QI)方法可以提供人口水平的计划,它是急需的替代方法和更有效的方法,有助于回答公共卫生实践问题,例如“我们如何知道项目或计划何时真正起作用,更重要的是,我们如何做得更好?”本文着重介绍Buncombe县卫生署(BCDH)在称为H1N1流感的特定公众上采用称为改进模型(MFI)的QI方法的经验,该计划结合了计划研究行为周期和小的变化测试。健康准备交流项目。此外,BCDH参与QI计划和培训的结果导致成功地在卫生部门的其他领域实施了变更,包括将等待时间缩短,并将积压的产前就诊预约从54天减少到15天,并使产前病史效率提高了一倍以上在5周内摄取。 BCDH中的这些案例研究介绍了MFI如何在组织内部引入连续QI文化的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号