...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychiatric research >Should we be anxious when assessing anxiety using the Beck Anxiety Inventory in clinical insomnia patients?
【24h】

Should we be anxious when assessing anxiety using the Beck Anxiety Inventory in clinical insomnia patients?

机译:在临床失眠症患者中使用贝克焦虑量表评估焦虑时,我们应该焦虑吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessing for clinical levels of anxiety is crucial, as comorbid insomnias far outnumber primary insomnias (PI). Such assessment is complex since those with Anxiety Disorders (AD) and those with PI have overlapping symptoms. Because of this overlap, we need studies that examine the assessment of anxiety in clinical insomnia groups. Participants (N = 207) were classified as having insomnia: 1) without an anxiety disorder (I-ND), or 2) with an anxiety disorder (I-AD). Mean Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) item responses were compared using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and follow-up ANOVAs. As a validity check, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine if the BAI suggested clinical cutoff was valid for identifying clinical levels of anxiety in this comorbid patient group. The I-ND had lower mean BAI scores than I-AD. There were significant group differences on 12 BAI items. The ROC curve analysis revealed the suggested BAI cutoff (>/=16) had 55% sensitivity and 78% specificity. Although anxiety scores were highest in those with insomnia and an anxiety disorder, those with insomnia only had scores in the mild range for anxiety. Nine items did not distinguish between those insomnia sufferers with and without an anxiety disorder. Additionally, published cutoffs for the BAI were not optimal for identifying anxiety disorders in those with insomnia. Such limitations must be considered before using this measure in insomnia patient groups. In addition, the poor specificity and high number of overlapping symptoms between insomnia and anxiety highlight the diagnostic challenges facing clinicians.
机译:临床焦虑水平的评估至关重要,因为合并症失眠症远远超过原发性失眠症(PI)。这样的评估很复杂,因为患有焦虑症(AD)的患者和患有PI的患者有重叠的症状。由于这种重叠,我们需要进行研究以检查临床失眠症患者对焦虑的评估。参与者(N = 207)被分类为患有失眠:1)没有焦虑症(I-ND),或2)患有焦虑症(I-AD)。使用多元方差分析(MANOVA)和随访方差分析比较平均贝克焦虑量表(BAI)项目反应。作为有效性检查,进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以确定BAI建议的临床临界值是否可有效识别该合并症患者组的临床焦虑水平。 I-ND的平均BAI得分低于I-AD。在12个BAI项目上存在显着的组差异。 ROC曲线分析显示,建议的BAI临界值(> / = 16)具有55%的敏感性和78%的特异性。尽管失眠和焦虑症患者的焦虑评分最高,但失眠者的焦虑评分仅在轻度范围内。九项没有区分那些有和没有焦虑症的失眠患者。此外,已公布的BAI临界值对于识别失眠症患者的焦虑症并非最佳选择。在失眠患者组中使用此措施之前,必须考虑此类限制。此外,失眠和焦虑之间特异性差且症状重叠的数量众多,这凸显了临床医生面临的诊断挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号