首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychiatric practice. >Efficacy and safety of oral aripiprazole compared with haloperidol in patients transitioning from acute treatment with intramuscular formulations.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of oral aripiprazole compared with haloperidol in patients transitioning from acute treatment with intramuscular formulations.

机译:从氟哌啶醇的急性治疗过渡至口服的患者,口服阿立哌唑与氟哌啶醇的疗效和安全性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To report efficacy and safety of transitioning patients receiving intramuscular (IM) formulations of aripiprazole or haloperidol to their respective oral formulations. METHODS: 448 agitated patients with schizophrenia (73%) or schizoaffective disorder (27%) were randomized to receive aripiprazole IM 9.75 mg, haloperidol IM 6.5 mg, or placebo IM within 24 hours. Patients treated with aripiprazole IM or haloperidol IM who completed this 24-hour IM phase were transitioned to the respective blinded oral formulations for 4 days (aripiprazole 10-15 mg/day, n = 153; haloperidol 7.5-10 mg/day, n = 151). Patients treated with placebo IM were transitioned to oral aripiprazole (analysis not included). The primary efficacy measure was mean change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component (PEC) score from baseline of oral phase (last value from 24-hour IM phase) to endpoint (study day 5, last observation carried forward). RESULTS: During the oral phase, aripiprazole 15 mg and haloperidol 10 mg were both effective in maintaining responses achieved on all efficacy measures during the 24-hour IM phase. Mean improvements in PEC scores from study day 1 to 5 were -1.37 for aripiprazole and -1.40 for haloperidol (p = NS for aripiprazole versus haloperidol). Oral aripiprazole was well tolerated. Extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events were lower for aripiprazole (1.3%) than haloperidol (8.0%). Nausea and vomiting occurred more frequently in patients receiving aripiprazole (3.9% and 2.6%, respectively) than in those receiving haloperidol (0.7% and 1.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder treated with aripiprazole IM or haloperidol IM demonstrated similar effective and safe transition to their respective oral formulations. Initial benefits of reduced agitation and improved clinical status during the IM phase of the study were maintained throughout the oral phase of the study with good tolerability.
机译:目的:报告接受阿立哌唑或氟哌啶醇的肌内(IM)制剂转为各自口服制剂的患者的疗效和安全性。方法:将448名精神分裂症(73%)或分裂情感障碍(27%)的躁动患者随机分配在24小时内接受阿立哌唑IM 9.75 mg,氟哌啶醇IM 6.5 mg或安慰剂IM。完成此24小时IM期的接受阿立哌唑IM或氟哌啶醇IM治疗的患者转入各自的盲法口服制剂4天(阿立哌唑10-15 mg /天,n = 153;氟哌啶醇7.5-10 mg / day,n = 151)。接受安慰剂IM治疗的患者转为口服阿立哌唑(不包括分析)。主要疗效指标是从口服阶段的基线(24小时IM阶段的最新值)到终点(研究第5天,最后进行的观察)的阳性和阴性综合征量表兴奋成分(PEC)评分的平均变化。结果:在口服阶段,阿立哌唑15毫克和氟哌啶醇10毫克均能有效维持在24小时IM阶段所有功效指标上获得的反应。从研究的第1天到第5天,阿立哌唑的PEC评分平均改善为-1.37,氟哌啶醇为-1.40(阿立哌唑与氟哌啶醇的p = NS)。口服阿立哌唑耐受良好。阿立哌唑的锥体外系症状相关不良事件(1.3%)比氟哌啶醇(8.0%)低。与接受氟哌啶醇的患者(分别为0.7%和1.3%)相比,接受阿立哌唑(分别为3.9%和2.6%)患者的恶心和呕吐发生率更高。结论:使用阿立哌唑IM或氟哌啶醇IM治疗的精神分裂症或精神分裂症的急性躁狂患者表现出相似的有效且安全的过渡至各自口服制剂的趋势。在研究的IM阶段,在整个口服阶段都保持了减少躁动和改善临床状态的最初好处,并且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号