...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing >ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF TEACHING DEMANDS ON RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY AMONG DOCTORAL NURSING PROGRAM FACULTY
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF TEACHING DEMANDS ON RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY AMONG DOCTORAL NURSING PROGRAM FACULTY

机译:评估教学需求对博士后护理课程研究生产率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article reports the findings of a study that examined the research and scholarship productivity of doctorally prepared nursing faculty teaching and mentoring doctoral students and the conflicting demands on them to maintain programs of research and scholarship. The specific aims were to (a) examine the research productivity and scholarship of faculty members teaching in doctoral programs and mentoring doctoral students to examine the perceived effectiveness of existing institutional mechanisms to support scholarship, (b) explore institutional features and personal practices used by doctoral program faculty to develop and maintain research and scholarship productivity, and (c) analyze predictors of scholarship productivity. Data were collected via an on-line researcher-developed survey that examined doctoral faculty roles/responsibilities and their relationship to their scholarly productivity, overall research productivity, and institutional features and personal practices to support research/scholarship activities. Survey respondents reported spending a large amount of time engaged in research related activities with 58.9% (n = 326) spending anywhere from 6 to 20 hours per week conducting research, writing research-based papers, giving presentations, grant writing, or conducting evidence-based improvement projects. Scholar productivity among the respondents was robust. Personal practices that most strongly supported faculty members' scholarship productivity were the belief that engaging in scholarship made them better teachers and the personal gratification in experiencing doctoral students' successes. A multiple regression analysis conducted to determine predictors of productivity indicated that the strongest predictor was the average number of hours spent on research/scholarship-related activities, followed by time bought out from teaching and other responsibilities of the faculty role for research. (Index words: Doctoral nursing faculty; Research productivity; Mentoring doctoral students; Doctoral nursing education). (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文报告了一项研究的结果,该研究检查了博士预备的护理系教学和指导博士生的研究和奖学金生产率,以及他们维持研究和奖学金计划的矛盾要求。具体目标是(a)研究在博士课程中教学的教职人员的研究效率和奖学金,并指导博士生研究支持奖学金的现有制度机制的感知有效性;(b)探索博士所使用的制度特征和个人实践计划的教职员工,以发展和保持研究和奖学金的生产率,以及(c)分析奖学金生产率的预测因素。数据是通过在线的,由研究人员开发的调查收集的,该调查检查了博士教师的角色/职责及其与他们的学术生产力,整体研究生产力以及支持研究/奖学金活动的机构特征和个人实践之间的关系。受访者表示,他们花费了大量时间从事与研究相关的活动,其中58.9%(n = 326)每周花费6至20个小时从事研究,撰写研究论文,进行演讲,赠款撰写或进行证据研究,基础的改进项目。受访者中学者的生产力很高。坚决支持教师奖学金生的个人实践是,相信奖学金可以使他们成为更好的老师,并获得博士生成功的个人满足感。为了确定生产率的预测因素而进行的多元回归分析表明,最强的预测因素是花费在研究/奖学金相关活动上的平均小时数,其次是从教学中花费的时间以及教师在研究中的其他职责。 (关键词:博士护理系;研究生产力;指导博士生;博士护理教育)。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号