首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthetics and orthotics: JPO >Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published from 2009 through 2011 in the Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Journal of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists
【24h】

Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published from 2009 through 2011 in the Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Journal of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists

机译:2009年至2011年在《假肢与矫形杂志》,《美国矫形与假肢学院学报》上发表的文章的文献计量分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this bibliometric analysis was to describe trends in publication of the Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics (JPO) during the past 3 years. A total of 95 articles published from 2009 to 2011 were included. Articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers, and information for 22 different domains was captured using an Excel spreadsheet. Data from each of these domains were analyzed to determine trends in research and publication of articles in the JPO for the past 3 years. Notable trends included the following: a greater percentage of prosthetics (68.4%) compared with orthotics (27.4%) articles, differences in median age for prosthetics (33 years) versus orthotics (15.4 years) articles, and a greater number of males (76.7%) used as subjects in prosthetics articles compared with females (23.3%). Only a small percentage of articles were extramurally funded for prosthetics (38.5%) and orthotics (34.6%). This analysis shows that more emphasis is currently placed on prosthetics than orthotics research, and most of this research is not extramurally funded. In addition, the demographics of the subjects used in these studies do not accurately reflect the demographics of patients using prostheses and orthoses. Future research could analyze a wider range of years to identify other trends.
机译:文献计量分析的目的是描述过去3年中《假肢与矫形杂志》(JPO)出版的趋势。收录了2009年至2011年发表的95篇文章。文章由两名独立的审阅者审阅,并使用Excel电子表格捕获了22个不同域的信息。分析了来自这些领域中每个领域的数据,以确定过去3年中JPO中文章的研究和出版趋势。显着的趋势包括以下几方面:假肢的比例(68.4%)高于矫形器(27.4%),假肢的中位年龄(33岁)与矫正器(15.4岁)之间的差异,以及男性的数量更多(76.7) %)被用作假肢的对象,而女性(23.3%)。仅一小部分的文章由假体(38.5%)和矫形器(34.6%)的额外费用提供。该分析表明,与假肢研究相比,目前对假肢的重视程度更高,而且大部分研究并非来自外部。此外,这些研究中使用的受试者的人口统计学不能准确反映使用假肢和矫形器的患者的统计学。未来的研究可能会分析更广泛的年份,以发现其他趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号