...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation >Hydroxyethylstarch 200 and 240 differently affect aortic distensibility but not viscosity and blood pressure upon acute isovolumic hemodilution.
【24h】

Hydroxyethylstarch 200 and 240 differently affect aortic distensibility but not viscosity and blood pressure upon acute isovolumic hemodilution.

机译:羟乙基淀粉200和240在急性等容血液稀释中对主动脉扩张性的影响不同,但对粘度和血压的影响不同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: It has been shown that a hydroxyethylstarch solution significantly increases the aortic distensibility coefficient (ADC) as compared to other non-hydroxyethylstarch colloid solutions. In order to investigate whether the effect of hydroxyethylstarch on ADC is class-specific, we investigated the effect of two hydroxyethylstarch solutions (HES 200: Elohes and HES 240: Hesteril) on the ADC and compared them with two other colloid solutions: 5% albumin and fluid gelatin (Gelofusin) in a rabbit model of acute isovolumic hemodilution. METHODS: Twenty-eight male New Zealand white rabbits were anesthetized and randomly allocated to receive (n=7, each): albumin, hydroxyethylstarch-200, hydroxyethylstarch-240 and gelatin for acute isovolumic hemodilution by exchanging 13 ml.kg(-1) body weight of blood with an identical volume of the test solution. Blood viscosity, mean arterial pressure, aortic blood flow and heart rate were measured and ADC was calculated. RESULTS: All groups were comparable with respect to arterial pressure, heart rate and aortic blood flow velocity before and after isovolumic hemodilution. After hemodilution, ADC coefficient remained unchanged as compared with pre-hemodilution values with albumin, hydroxyethylstarch-240 and gelatin, whereas a sustained 3 fold increase was observed with hydroxyethylstarch-200. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that minor physicochemical differences between two hydroxyethylstarch solutions result in measurable differences in ADC and suggest that the clinical effects of colloids should probably be analyzed for each type of colloid and not for classes of colloids (e.g. hydroxyethylstarch or fluid gelatins).
机译:目的:已证明,与其他非羟乙基淀粉胶体溶液相比,羟乙基淀粉溶液可显着增加主动脉扩张系数(ADC)。为了研究羟乙基淀粉对ADC的影响是否是类特异性的,我们研究了两种羟乙基淀粉溶液(HES 200:Elohes和HES 240:Hesteril)对ADC的作用,并将它们与其他两种胶体溶液:5%白蛋白进行了比较。和液体明胶(Gelofusin)在兔急性等容血液稀释中的模型。方法:麻醉28只新西兰大白兔,随机分配(每组7只):白蛋白,羟乙基淀粉200,羟乙基淀粉240和明胶,通过交换13 ml.kg(-1)进行急性等容血液稀释。血液的体重与相同体积的测试溶液相同。测量血液粘度,平均动脉压,主动脉血流量和心率,并计算ADC。结果:在等容血液稀释前后,动脉压,心率和主动脉血流速度均具有可比性。血液稀释后,与白蛋白,羟乙基淀粉-240和明胶的血液稀释前值相比,ADC系数保持不变,而羟乙基淀粉-200则观察到持续3倍的增加。结论:这些结果表明两种羟乙基淀粉溶液之间的微小理化差异导致ADC的可测量差异,并建议应针对每种类型的胶体而不是针对类别的胶体(例如羟乙基淀粉或液体明胶)分析胶体的临床效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号