...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >A comparison of two soldering techniques on the misfit of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures
【24h】

A comparison of two soldering techniques on the misfit of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures

机译:两种焊接技术对条形固位种植体支持的覆盖义齿错配的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study was conducted to measure and compare the effect of the soldering method (torch soldering or ceramic furnace soldering) used for soldering bars to bar-retained, implant-supported overdentures on the fit between the bar gold cylinder and implant transgingival abutment. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two overdenture implant bars were manufactured and screw retained into two Br?nemark implants, which were attached to a cow rib. The bars were randomly distributed in two groups: a torch-soldering group and a porcelain-furnace soldering group. Then all bars were cut and soldered using a torch and a ceramic furnace. The fit between the bar gold cylinders and implant transgingival abutments was measured with a light microscope on the opposite side to the screw tightening side before and after the bar soldering procedure. The data obtained were statistically processed for paired and independent data. Results: The average misfit for all bars before soldering was 33.83 to 54.04 μm. After cutting and soldering the bars, the misfit increased up to a range of 71.74 to 78.79 μm. Both before and after the soldering procedure, the bars soldered using a torch showed a higher misfit when compared to the bars soldered using a porcelain furnace. After the soldering procedure, the misfit was slightly lower on the left side of the bars, which had been soldered using a ceramic furnace. Conclusions: According to our data, the soldering of bars using the torch or furnace oven soldering techniques does not improve the misfit of one-piece cast bars on two implants. The lower misfit was obtained using the porcelain furnace soldering technique.
机译:目的:进行这项研究的目的是测量和比较用于将金条焊接到金条固定的,种植体支撑的义齿上的焊接方法(炬焊或陶瓷炉焊接)对金条圆柱体和种植体龈龈基台之间配合的影响。材料和方法:制造了32个覆盖义齿的种植棒,并将其螺钉固定在两个Br?nemark种植体中,并将​​其连接到牛肋骨上。焊条随机分为两组:焊炬焊接组和瓷炉焊接组。然后使用割炬和陶瓷炉将所有棒材切割和焊接。在棒焊接过程之前和之后,在与螺钉拧紧侧相反的一侧用光学显微镜测量棒金圆筒和植入物龈龈基台之间的配合。对获得的数据进行统计处理以获取成对的独立数据。结果:焊接前所有条的平均失配率为33.83至54.04μm。在切割和焊接条之后,失配增加到71.74至78.79μm的范围。与使用瓷炉进行焊接的棒材相比,在焊接过程之前和之后,使用焊枪进行焊接的棒材的失配性更高。焊接程序完成后,在使用陶瓷炉进行焊接的焊条的左侧,失配率略低。结论:根据我们的数据,使用割炬或炉式炉焊接技术进行的条形钎焊不会改善一件式铸件在两个植入物上的错配。使用瓷炉焊接技术可获得较低的失配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号