首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Microleakage of porcelain and composite machined crowns cemented with self-adhesive or conventional resin cement.
【24h】

Microleakage of porcelain and composite machined crowns cemented with self-adhesive or conventional resin cement.

机译:用自粘或常规树脂胶粘剂粘结的瓷器和复合材料加工的牙冠的微渗漏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Resistance of machined crowns to microleakage when cemented with new self-adhesive cements has not been fully investigated. This study evaluated microleakage of machined crowns milled from porcelain and composite blocks and bonded to teeth with self-adhesive and conventional resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two freshly extracted premolars of similar shape and size were sterilized and mounted in resin blocks. Teeth received standard crown preparations with 1-mm circumferential shoulder finish line, flat occlusal surface reduced by 2 mm, and ideal angle of convergence. Prepared teeth were divided into two equal groups and assigned to either porcelain (Vita Mark II, Vident) or composite (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) blocks for crown fabrication. Optical impressions were captured for each tooth with the intraoral camera of a CEREC 3D machine. Crowns were designed and milled from both materials. Each group was then subdivided into two subgroups (n = 8) according to cement used (self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE or resin cement with self-etching adhesive, Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray). Following seating, a 5-kg weight was applied on the occlusal surface of the crown for 5 minutes. Specimens were then stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Specimens were thermocycled for 3000 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, then coated with nail varnish and immersed in a 2.0% basic red fuchsine dye solution for 24 hours. Teeth were then rinsed and sectioned mesiodistally and assessed under magnification for microleakage. A five-point scale was used to score degree of microleakage. Data were statistically analyzed with 2-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. RESULTS: Crown material had no significant effect on microleakage (p= 0.67); however, cement type had a significant effect (p < 0.0001), with Panavia F 2.0 resulting in lower microleakage scores than RelyX Unicem. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the self-adhesive cement, the resin cement with separate primer/bonding agent resulted in significantly lower microleakage scores, irrespective of crown material.
机译:用途:尚未完全研究机加工的牙冠与新型自粘水泥胶结后的微渗漏性。这项研究评估了用瓷和复合材料块磨制并用自粘和常规树脂水泥粘结到牙齿的机加工冠的微渗漏。材料与方法:将32个形状和大小相似的新鲜提取的前磨牙消毒并安装在树脂块中。牙齿接受了标准的牙冠准备,其肩周线边缘为1毫米,咬合平面减小了2毫米,并且收敛角度理想。将准备好的牙齿分为两个相等的组,并分配到瓷器(Vita Mark II,Vident)或复合材料(Paradigm MZ100,3M ESPE)中进行牙冠制造。使用CEREC 3D机器的口腔摄像头捕获每个牙齿的光学印模。冠由两种材料设计和铣削而成。然后根据所使用的水泥(自粘性树脂水泥,RelyX Unicem,3M ESPE或具有自蚀刻粘合剂的树脂水泥,Panavia F 2.0,Kuraray)将每组细分为两个子组(n = 8)。坐下后,将5公斤重的重量施加在牙冠的咬合面上5分钟。然后将样品在37摄氏度的水中储存24小时。将样品在5摄氏度至55摄氏度之间热循环3000次,然后涂上指甲油并浸入2.0%碱性红色品红染料溶液中24小时。然后冲洗牙齿并进行近中切,并在放大下评估微渗漏。使用五点量表对微渗漏程度进行评分。数据采用2通方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验进行统计分析。结果:冠材料对微渗漏没有显着影响(p = 0.67);但是,水泥类型具有显着影响(p <0.0001),Panavia F 2.0导致的微渗漏评分低于RelyX Unicem。结论:与自粘水泥相比,具有单独的底漆/粘合剂的树脂水泥导致微渗漏评分显着降低,而与冠材料无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号