首页> 外文期刊>Coastal management >A Deliberate Inclusive Policy (DIP) Approach for Coastal Resources Governance: A Fijian Perspective
【24h】

A Deliberate Inclusive Policy (DIP) Approach for Coastal Resources Governance: A Fijian Perspective

机译:沿海资源治理的蓄意包容性政策(DIP)方法:斐济视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this article is to analyze and identify gaps in Fisheries Act 1942 (Chapter 158, 1991 and 1997 Decree), the policymaking structure and use of policy instruments via a meta-policy approach. It captures the views of other researchers in coastal and marine governance, and offers socioeconomic, ecological, and management suggestions for future fisheries legislations. Fiji’s marine environment is threatened by increased population growth, coastal development, urban pollution and inadequate legislative frameworks to addresses these pressures. The existing Fisheries Act and associated policy frameworks are inadequate to support the conservation, management, and sustainable use of inshore coastal and marine resources. Much of the current policies, in particular the Fisheries Act, are approached from a governmental perspective towards maximizing commercial production with little recognition of addressing and solving conservation and broader environmental problems associated with inshore marine fisheries resources. The most important recommendations that emerges from this review is that any new fisheries legislation must promote streamlined policymaking process, use a mixture of market and non-market-based policy instruments and integrate broad views of other ministries, citizen groups as well as initiatives of local communities. There is strong evidence to give recognition and strengthen customary marine practices such as fishing areas (qoliqoli), while extending community engagement, participation, and awareness to wider sectors involving subsistence users, artisanal, commercial, aquarium, and aquaculture sectors. The article proposes the use of ecosystem-based approach, deliberate inclusive process (DIP) and co-management to policymaking and implementation to help facilitate the measures outlined towards improved coastal governance and conservation of inshore marine resources.
机译:本文的目的是分析和找出1942年《渔业法》(第158章,1991年和1997年法令),决策结构和通过元政策方法使用政策工具方面的差距。它收集了其他研究人员在沿海和海洋治理方面的观点,并为未来的渔业立法提供了社会经济,生态和管理方面的建议。斐济的海洋环境受到人口增长,沿海发展,城市污染以及解决这些压力的立法框架不足的威胁。现有的《渔业法》和相关的政策框架不足以支持近海沿海和海洋资源的养护,管理和可持续利用。当前的许多政策,特别是《渔业法》,是从政府的角度出发实现最大程度的商业生产的,几乎没有认识到解决和解决与近海海洋渔业资源有关的养护和更广泛的环境问题。这次审查提出的最重要的建议是,任何新的渔业立法都必须促进简化的决策过程,使用基于市场和基于非市场的政策工具的混合,并整合其他部委,公民团体以及地方政府的倡议的广泛观点。社区。有确凿的证据表明,人们承认并加强了常规的海洋做法,例如捕鱼区(qoliqoli),同时将社区的参与,参与和意识扩大到涉及生计使用者,个体,商业,水族馆和水产养殖部门的广泛部门。本文建议使用基于生态系统的方法,蓄意的包容性过程(DIP)以及对决策和实施的共同管理,以帮助促进为改善沿海治理和近岸海洋资源保护而概述的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号