...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Plant Physiology >The response of contrasting tomato genotypes to combined heat and drought stress
【24h】

The response of contrasting tomato genotypes to combined heat and drought stress

机译:不同番茄基因型对高温和干旱胁迫的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Efforts to maximize yields of food crops can be undermined by abiotic stress factors, particularly those related to climate change. Here, we use a range of physiological methods to detect the individual and combined effects of heat and drought stress on three contrasting varieties of tomato: Hybrid 61, Moskvich, and Nagcarlang. Seedlings were acclimated under the following treatment regimes: CONTROL (25-36 degrees C; well-watered), DRY (25-36 degrees C; 20% field capacity), HOT (25-42 degrees C; well-watered) and HOT + DRY (25-42 degrees C; 20% field capacity). In each treatment, stomatal conductance, leaf temperature, chlorophyll content, and several chlorophyll fluorescence variables (both in situ and in vitro following a heat shock treatment) were measured. Plants from the HOT treatment remained statistically similar to the CONTROL plants in most of the measured parameters, while those from the DRY treatment and especially the HOT + DRY treatment showed clear effects of abiotic stress. Hybrid 61 showed considerable resilience to heat and drought stress compared to the other varieties, with significantly cooler leaves (one day after treatments imposed) and significantly higher Fv/Fm values both in situ and in vitro. The genotypic differences in resilience to heat stress were only apparent under water-limited conditions, highlighting the need to consider leaf temperature rather than air temperature when testing for tolerance to heat stress. The most effective parameters for discriminating genotypic variation in heat and drought stress were in vitro Fv/Fm and chlorophyll content. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:非生物胁迫因素,尤其是与气候变化有关的非生物胁迫因素,可能会破坏使粮食作物的单产最大化的努力。在这里,我们使用了多种生理方法来检测高温和干旱胁迫对三种不同番茄品种的单独影响和综合影响:Hybrid 61,Moskvich和Nagcarlang。在以下处理方案下使幼苗适应环境:对照(25-36摄氏度;水分充足),干(25-36摄氏度;田间持水量为20%),高温(25-42摄氏度;水分充足)和高温+干(25-42摄氏度; 20%的磁场容量)。在每种处理中,都测量了气孔导度,叶片温度,叶绿素含量和一些叶绿素荧光变量(热休克处理后的原位和体外)。在大多数测量参数中,HOT处理得到的植物在统计学上仍与对照植物相似,而DRY处理特别是HOT + DRY处理得到的植物表现出明显的非生物胁迫效应。与其他品种相比,Hybrid 61表现出对高温和干旱胁迫的显着抵御能力,叶片(处理后一天)的叶子明显凉爽,并且原位和体外的Fv / Fm值均明显更高。抗热胁迫的基因型差异仅在水分受限的条件下才明显,这突出表明在测试对热胁迫的耐受性时需要考虑叶片温度而不是空气温度。区分高温和干旱胁迫的基因型变异的最有效参数是体外Fv / Fm和叶绿素含量。 (C)2016 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号