...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection >Effect of intercropping cowpea with maize or cassava on cowpea bacterial blight and yield.
【24h】

Effect of intercropping cowpea with maize or cassava on cowpea bacterial blight and yield.

机译:套种玉米或木薯的cow豆对cow豆细菌枯萎病和产量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effect of intercropping cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) with cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) or maize (Zea mays L.) on bacterial blight of cowpea caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vignicola was investigated in five cropping systems: cowpea monoculture at high density and at low density, cowpea-maize 'within row', cowpea-maize 'in alternate rows', and cowpea-cassava 'in alternate rows', in the forest savanna transition zone of Benin over two years. After inoculation of field border plants, disease severity index and incidence were measured as areas under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). The AUDPCs for disease incidence and severity were reduced in one of four treatments in each of two subsequent years, and one of four treatments in one year, respectively, in the 'in alternate row' patterns compared to monoculture at high density. Disease incidence was higher in cowpea monoculture at high density than in cowpea-cassava 'in alternate rows' in year 1996, and in cowpea-maize 'in alternate rows' in year 1997. The disease severity index was reduced by 50% in the cowpea-cassava 'in alternate rows' pattern in 1997, but not in 1996. Highest percentages of leaves with spots or blight occurred only in the cowpea monoculture at high density. Compared with monoculture, cowpea yield was about 60% in intercropping with cassava and about 40% in intercropping with maize. Cassava yielded 45-57% and maize 53-60% compared to monocropped cassava and maize, respectively. Comparing the land efficiency use of cowpea monoculture at high density to intercropping, the land equivalent ratio was similar in the intercropping systems with 'alternate row' patterns, and a yield loss of cowpea in intercropping was compensated by the additional yield of the intercrop. Although no stable effect of intercropping on disease reduction was observed, intercropping cowpea with maize or cassava 'in alternate rows' reduced bacterial blight in some cases and generally gives the farmer more yield security in case of failure of one crop. Therefore, intercropping as one element of an integrated control strategy for cowpea bacterial blight should not be abolished by farmers in favour of monocropping cowpea.
机译:套种cow豆(Vigna unguiculata(L.)Walp。)与木薯(Manihot esculenta Crantz)或玉米(Zea mays L.)间作对由Xanthomonas axonopodis pv引起的cow豆细菌性枯萎病的影响。在五个种植系统中对vignicola进行了调查:在森林大草原过渡期,高密度和低密度的cow豆单一栽培,“排内”的pea豆-玉米,“隔行”的cow豆-玉米和“隔行”的cow豆-木薯“隔行”贝宁地区超过两年。接种田间边界植物后,将疾病严重性指数和发病率测量为疾病进程曲线(AUDPC)下的面积。与高密度单培养相比,随后两年分别以四种处理之一降低了疾病发病率和严重性的AUDPC,一年中四种处理之一降低了AUDPC。 density豆高密度单一栽培中的发病率高于“交替行”中的cow豆-木薯,在1996年和1997年在“交替行中”的pea豆-玉米中。.豆的疾病严重性指数降低了50% -木薯在1997年“交替排列”,但在1996年没有。有斑点或枯萎病的叶的最高百分比仅在the豆单一栽培中以高密度出现。与单作相比,木薯间作的pea豆产量约为60%,玉米间作的cow豆产量约为40%。与单作木薯和玉米相比,木薯的产量分别为45-57%和玉米的53-60%。比较高密度of豆单作与间作的土地利用效率,在具有“交替行”模式的间作系统中,土地当量比相似,并且间作增加了产量,弥补了间作中of豆的产量损失。尽管没有观察到套作对减灾的稳定作用,但在某些情况下,将pea豆与玉米或木薯“隔行”套种可以减少细菌疫病,并且通常在一种农作物歉收的情况下为农民提供更多的产量保障。因此,农民不应该废除套种作为b豆细菌性疫病综合控制策略的一个要素,而应改为单种种植cro豆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号