...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods >Use of the viability reagent PrestoBlue in comparison with alamarBlue and MTT to assess the viability of human corneal epithelial cells
【24h】

Use of the viability reagent PrestoBlue in comparison with alamarBlue and MTT to assess the viability of human corneal epithelial cells

机译:将活力试剂PrestoBlue与alamarBlue和MTT进行比较来评估人角膜上皮细胞的活力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: PrestoBlue is a new resazurin based reagent to assess cell viability and cytotoxicity. It is claimed to be a fast and highly sensitive assay. Here, we compared PrestoBlue, alamarBlue, and 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazoniumbromide (MTT) in assessing cell viability of human corneal epithelial cells (HCEC), and investigated the effect of plate color, reading mode, and plate storage on the performance of PrestoBlue assay. Methods: The viability of different numbers of healthy HCEC and the toxicity of various chemicals on HCEC were evaluated using PrestoBlue (fluorescence), alamarBlue (fluorescence), and MTT (absorbance). The sensitivities of the three assays were compared. In the PrestoBlue assay, three plate colors and two reading modes were used and compared in assessing the toxic effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The PrestoBlue solutions after reaction were stored and measured on day 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. The fluorescence readings obtained on different days were then compared. Results: Both PrestoBlue and alamarBlue were able to detect 5000 healthy cells after 30 min incubation and 1000 cells after 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h incubation; while MTT was able to detect 5000 cells after 3 h incubation. In the assessment of the toxicity of various chemicals, PrestoBlue and alamarBlue performed similarly. There was no significant difference between the results obtained by these two reagents. All the three plate colors and two reading modes showed similar results in the PrestoBlue assay in assessing the toxicity of SDS. Plate storage up to 7 days did not affect the result of the PrestoBlue assay. Conclusion: Our study suggests that in evaluating the viability of HCEC, PrestoBlue is more sensitive than MTT, but similar to alamarBlue. The plate color, reading mode and plate storage up to 7 days did not affect the performance of the PrestoBlue assay. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:简介:PrestoBlue是一种基于刃天青的新型试剂,可评估细胞活力和细胞毒性。据称它是一种快速且高度灵敏的测定法。在这里,我们比较了PrestoBlue,alamarBlue和3- [4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基] -2,5-二苯基溴化四唑鎓(MTT)在评估人角膜上皮细胞(HCEC)的细胞生存力中的作用,并研究了板的颜色,读取模式和板存储对PrestoBlue分析的性能。方法:使用PrestoBlue(荧光),alamarBlue(荧光)和MTT(吸光度)评估了不同数量的健康HCEC的生存力以及各种化学物质对HCEC的毒性。比较了三种测定的敏感性。在PrestoBlue分析中,使用了三种板色和两种读取模式,并在评估十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)的毒性作用时进行了比较。反应后的PrestoBlue溶液在第1、2、3、5和7天进行存储和测量。然后比较不同天获得的荧光读数。结果:PrestoBlue和alamarBlue在30分钟的孵育后都能检测到5000个健康细胞,在1 h,2 h和4 h的孵育后能够检测到1000个细胞。孵育3小时后,MTT能够检测到5000个细胞。在评估各种化学品的毒性时,PrestoBlue和alamarBlue的表现相似。这两种试剂获得的结果之间没有显着差异。在PrestoBlue分析中评估SDS的毒性时,所有三种板色和两种读取模式均显示出相似的结果。板保存长达7天不会影响PrestoBlue分析的结果。结论:我们的研究表明,在评估HCEC的生存力时,PrestoBlue比MTT敏感,但与alamarBlue相似。板的颜色,读取模式和板保存长达7天都不会影响PrestoBlue分析的性能。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号