...
【24h】

Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals.

机译:儿科外科杂志临床研究中与质量报告相关的方法学标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Reports of clinical trials often lack adequate descriptions of design and analysis; recent attention has focused on improving this omission so readers can properly assess the strength of the findings and draw their own conclusions. Similar analysis of study design and methodologic standards associated with quality reporting has not been carried out for pediatric surgery journals. METHODS: All studies (n = 642) published in 1998 in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (JPS) and Pediatric Surgery International (PSI), were reviewed for demographic data and study design. The frequency of reporting of 11 basic elements of design and analysis was evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCT), nonrandomized clinical trials (NRCT), and retrospective cohorts (RC) from JPS by consensus of 2 assessors. RESULTS: Of the 642 studies, 17% of articles (111 of 642) were classified as clinical studies. Sixty-three were comparative studies and consisted of RC (n = 48), NRCT (n = 12), and RCT (n = 3). Two-thirds of articles published were either case reports or case series (431 of 642), and 16% were basic science articles. Demographic analysis showed a wide range of topics addressed, 4 authors per article, and multiple country of origin of authors. More than 66% of all RCT in JPS reported on eligibility criteria, admission before allocation, random allocation, method of randomization, patients' blindness to treatment, treatment complications, statistical analyses, statistical methods, loss to follow-up, and statistical methods; 2 elements of design and analysis, however, were poorly reported: blind assessment of outcome (33%) and power (17%). CONCLUSIONS: There were few randomized, controlled trials in pediatric surgery journals, and further attention should be given to evaluate the causal factors. Nine elements of quality reporting were well reported; however, 2 others were poorly reported; this may improve if editors of pediatric surgical journals provide authors with guidelines on how to report clinical trial design and analysis. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.
机译:背景/目的:临床试验报告通常缺乏对设计和分析的充分描述。最近的注意力集中在改善这一遗漏上,因此读者可以适当地评估发现的强度并得出自己的结论。儿科外科杂志尚未对与质量报告相关的研究设计和方法学标准进行类似分析。方法:对1998年发表在《小儿外科杂志》(JPS)和《国际小儿外科》(PSI)上的所有研究(n = 642)进行了人口统计学数据和研究设计的审查。在JPS的随机临床试验(RCT),非随机临床试验(NRCT)和回顾性队列研究(RC)中,由2位评估者达成共识,评估了11个设计和分析基本要素的报告频率。结果:在642项研究中,有17%的文章(642篇中的111篇)被分类为临床研究。六十三项是比较研究,由RC(n = 48),NRCT(n = 12)和RCT(n = 3)组成。发表的文章中有三分之二是病例报告或病例系列(642的431),而16%是基础科学文章。人口统计分析显示了广泛的主题,每篇文章有4位作者,并且作者来自多个国家。在JPS中所有RCT中超过66%的患者报告了资格标准,分配前的入院,随机分配,随机化方法,患者对治疗的盲目性,治疗并发症,统计分析,统计方法,随访失败和统计方法;然而,关于设计和分析的2个要素的报道却很少:对结果进行盲目评估(33%)和评估能力(17%)。结论:在儿科外科杂志上几乎没有随机对照试验,应进一步注意评估其因果关系。质量报告的九个要素得到了很好的报告;但是,另外2个报告不佳;如果小儿外科杂志的编辑为作者提供有关如何报告临床试验设计和分析的指南,则可能会有所改善。 W.B.版权所有2001桑德斯公司。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号