首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement
【24h】

Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement

机译:群体中的认知失调:意见分歧的后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As L. Festinger (1957) argued, the social group is a source of cognitive dissonance as well as a vehicle for reducing it. That is, disagreement from others in a group generates dissonance, and subsequent movement toward group consensus reduces this negative tension. The authors conducted 3 studies to demonstrate group-induced dissonance. In the first, students in a group with others who ostensibly disagreed with them experienced greater dissonance discomfort than those in a group with others who agreed. Study 2 demonstrated that standard moderators of dissonance in past research-lack of choice and opportunity to self-affirm, similarly reduced dissonance discomfort generated by group disagreement. In Study 3, the dissonance induced by group disagreement was reduced through a variety of interpersonal strategies to achieve consensus, including persuading others. changing one's own position, and joining an attitudinally congenial group.
机译:正如L. Festinger(1957)所论证的那样,社会群体是认知失调的根源,也是减少它的一种手段。也就是说,与团队中其他人的分歧会引起不和谐,随后朝着团队共识的方向减少这种负面压力。作者进行了3项研究,以证明群体诱发的不和谐。首先,与其他意见一致的学生相比,与其他意见相左的学生在一起的不和谐感更大。研究2表明,过去的研究中,标准的失谐主持人缺乏选择和自我确认的机会,同样减少了因群体分歧而引起的失谐不适。在研究3中,通过各种人际关系策略(包括说服他人),通过达成共识的各种人际关系策略,减少了因群体分歧而引起的不和谐。改变自己的位置,并加入一个态度相投的团体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号