首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pest science >Evaluation of entomopathogenic nematodes and their combined application against Curculio elephas and Polyphylla fullo larvae
【24h】

Evaluation of entomopathogenic nematodes and their combined application against Curculio elephas and Polyphylla fullo larvae

机译:昆虫病原线虫的评价及其联合应用对弓形虫和满枝幼虫的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The larvae of Curculio elephas (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Polyphylla fullo (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) are major agricultural pests of chestnut and roots of cultivated crops, respectively. Previous research showed that they are relatively resistant to nematode infection. Accordingly, we evaluated the efficacy of Steinernema glaseri, S. weiseri or Heterorhabditis bacteriophora alone or in combination against these two insect pests. A nematode concentration of 50 or 100 infective juveniles (IJs)/larva for C. elephas or 50 or 100 IJs/cm(2) for P. fullo at 25 A degrees C was used. The highest (81 %) and the lowest (21 %) larval mortalities for C. elephas were obtained with S. weiseri+H. bacteriophora combined application and S. glaseri alone, respectively. The nature of the interactions (antagonism, additive, or synergy) for the larval mortality was evaluated. For C. elephas, S. weiseri combined with S. glaseri or H. bacteriophora was additive, whereas the combination of S. glaseri+H. bacteriophora was antagonistic. For P. fullo, the efficiency of nematodes used alone or combinations was very low, and there were no significant differences among the treatments at 50 or 100 IJs/cm(2). The interaction was additive with the combinations of S. glaseri+H. bacteriophora against P. fullo larvae. No synergistic effect was observed for any combination against C. elephas and P. fullo larvae. Our results show that the EPN species tested, either alone or in combination, are not economically feasible for use against C. elephas or P. fullo, but that further research with other combinations of EPN species or EPNs with other entomopathogens is warranted.
机译:栗(Curculio elephas)(鞘翅目:Curculionidae)和and(Polyphylla fullo)(鞘翅目:Scarabaeidae)的幼虫分别是板栗的主要农业害虫和栽培作物的根。先前的研究表明它们对线虫感染具有相对的抵抗力。因此,我们评估了Steinernema glaseri,S。weiseri或Heterorhabditis bacteriophora单独或联合使用对这两种害虫的功效。对于线虫而言,线虫的浓度为50或100感染性幼体(IJs)/幼虫,对于25.摄氏度的富勒氏疟原虫,线虫的浓度为50或100 IJs / cm(2)。用S. weiseri + H获得线虫的最高(81%)和最低(21%)幼虫死亡率。细菌联合应用分别与单独的glaseri联合使用。评估了幼虫死亡率的相互作用(拮抗作用,加成作用或协同作用)的性质。对于秀丽隐杆线虫,魏氏链球菌与格拉斯氏链霉菌或嗜细菌链球菌的组合是加性的,而格拉斯氏链霉菌+ H的组合。细菌菌团是拮抗的。对于P. fullo,单独或组合使用的线虫效率非常低,并且在50或100 IJs / cm(2)的处理之间无显着差异。相互作用与格拉希酵母+ H的组合是加和的。细菌对满腹疟原虫幼虫。没有观察到任何针对线虫和富勒氏疟原虫幼虫的协同作用。我们的结果表明,单独或组合测试的EPN物种在经济上不适合用于防治线虫或福寿螺,但有必要对EPN物种的其他组合或EPN与其他昆虫病原体进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号