首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the revised NEO personality inventory
【24h】

Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the revised NEO personality inventory

机译:人格特征的跨文化比较有意义吗?修订的NEO人格清单中的差异项和方面功能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Measurement invariance is a prerequisite for confident cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to detect differential item functioning (DIF) in factor loadings and intercepts for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (P. T. Costa, Jr., & R. R. McCrae, 1992) in comparisons of college students in the United States (N = 261), Philippines (N = 268), and Mexico (N = 775). About 40%-50% of the items exhibited some form of DIF and item-level noninvariance often carried forward to the facet level at which scores are compared. After excluding DIF items, some facet scales were too short or unreliable for cross-cultural comparisons, and for some other facets, cultural mean differences were reduced or eliminated. The results indicate that considerable caution is warranted in cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles.
机译:测量的不变性是对人格特征进行自信的跨文化比较的前提。在美国大学生的比较中,使用多组确认性因子分析来检测修订的NEO人格量表(PT Costa,Jr。和RR McCrae,1992)在因子加载和拦截中的差异项功能(DIF)。 261),菲律宾(N = 268)和墨西哥(N = 775)。大约40%-50%的项目表现出某种形式的DIF,并且项目级别的不变性通常会延续到比较得分的方面。在排除DIF项目之后,对于跨文化比较而言,某些方面的规模太短或不可靠,而对于其他某些方面,则减少或消除了文化均值差异。结果表明,在跨文化比较人格特征时需要格外谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号