...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Physiotherapists systematically overestimate the amount of time stroke survivors spend engaged in active therapy rehabilitation: An observational study
【24h】

Physiotherapists systematically overestimate the amount of time stroke survivors spend engaged in active therapy rehabilitation: An observational study

机译:物理治疗师系统地高估了中风幸存者花费在主动疗法康复上的时间:一项观察性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Questions: How accurately do physiotherapists estimate how long stroke survivors spend in physiotherapy sessions and the amount of time stroke survivors are engaged in physical activity during physiotherapy sessions? Does the mode of therapy (individual sessions or group circuit classes) affect the accuracy of therapists' estimates? Design: Observational study embedded within a randomised trial. Participants: People who participated in the CIRCIT trial after having a stroke. Intervention: 47 therapy sessions scheduled and supervised by physiotherapists (n = 8) and physiotherapy assistants (n = 4) for trial participants were video-recorded. Outcome measures: Therapists' estimations of therapy time were compared to the video-recorded times. Results: The agreement between therapist-estimated and video-recorded data for total therapy time and active time was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.93) respectively. Agreement between therapist-estimated and video-recorded data for inactive time was good (ICC score 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.77). The mean (SD) difference between therapist-estimated and video-recorded total therapy time, active time, and inactive time for all sessions was 7.7 (10.5), 14.1 (10.3) and -6.9 (9.5) minutes respectively. Bland-Altman analyses revealed a systematic bias of overestimation of total therapy time and total active time, and underestimation of inactive time by therapists. Compared to individual therapy sessions, therapists estimated total circuit class therapy duration more accurately, but estimated active time within circuit classes less accurately. Conclusion: Therapists are inaccurate in their estimation of the amount of time stroke survivors are active during therapy sessions. When accurate therapy data are required, use of objective measures is recommended.
机译:问题:理疗师如何准确估计中风幸存者在理疗期间花费的时间以及中风幸存者在理疗期间从事体育锻炼的时间?治疗方式(个人会议或小组巡回课程)是否会影响治疗师估计的准确性?设计:一项纳入随机试验的观察性研究。参与者:中风后参加CIRCIT试验的人。干预:录像了由理疗师(n = 8)和理疗助手(n = 4)为试验参与者安排和监督的47个治疗会议的视频。结果指标:将治疗师对治疗时间的估计与视频记录的时间进行比较。结果:治疗师估计的数据和录像数据之间的总治疗时间和活动时间之间的一致性非常好,组内相关系数(ICC)为0.90(95%CI为0.83至0.95)和0.83(95%CI为0.73至0.93)分别。治疗师估计的数据和视频记录的无效时间之间的一致性很好(ICC得分为0.62,95%CI为0.40至0.77)。所有阶段的治疗师估计和视频记录的总治疗时间,活动时间和不活动时间之间的平均(SD)差异分别为7.7(10.5),14.1(10.3)和-6.9(9.5)分钟。 Bland-Altman分析显示,系统地偏重总治疗时间和总活跃时间,而治疗师则低估了无效时间。与单独的治疗课程相比,治疗师更准确地估计了总回路课程的治疗持续时间,但估计了回路课程内的活动时间不太准确。结论:治疗师对中风幸存者在治疗过程中活跃的时间估计不准确。当需要准确的治疗数据时,建议使用客观的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号