...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Periodontology >Surgical treatment of periodontal intrabony defects with calcium sulfate implant and barrier versus collagen barrier or open flap debridement alone: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial.
【24h】

Surgical treatment of periodontal intrabony defects with calcium sulfate implant and barrier versus collagen barrier or open flap debridement alone: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial.

机译:单独使用硫酸钙植入物和屏障与胶原屏障或开放皮瓣清创术进行牙周骨内缺损的手术治疗:一项为期12个月的随机对照临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of guided tissue regeneration with calcium sulfate graft and membrane (CS) versus guided tissue regeneration with collagen membrane (CM) or open flap debridement (OFD) only in terms of clinical attachment gain in periodontal intrabony defects. METHODS: Fifty-one systemically healthy, non-smoking subjects affected by moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were recruited. The subjects had one deep intrabony defect with a probing depth (PD) > or =6 mm and were randomly divided into three equal groups (17 subjects per group). Subjects were surgically treated with OFD (OFD group), OFD with CS (CS group), or OFD and CM (CM group). One year after surgical treatment, a complete clinical examination and a surgical reentry were performed. The pre- and post-therapy clinical parameters, including PD, clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and intrasurgical parameters (defect bone level [DBL]), were compared. RESULTS: After 1 year, the clinical and intrasurgical parameters showed statistically significant changes from baseline within each group for all of the evaluated parameters (PD and CAL, P <0.001; GR and DBL, P <0.05). Differences (PD, CAL, and DBL, P <0.001; GR, P <0.05) were also seen across the three groups. The CM and CS groups had significantly smaller PD, CAL, and DBL values than subjects treated with only OFD. Groups treated with regenerative techniques had a significantly greater PD reduction and CAL and DBL gain compared to the OFD group. No significant differences were seen between CM and CS. Conversely, the CM group showed a significantly greater GR increase compared to OFD and CS. CONCLUSIONS: Both regenerative treatments produced additional clinical benefits over OFD alone. Moreover, the use of CS may minimize post-surgical recession.
机译:背景:这项随机对照临床试验旨在仅在临床依从性方面比较使用硫酸钙移植物和膜(CS)进行引导的组织再生与使用胶原膜(CM)或开放皮瓣清创术(OFD)进行的引导组织再生的临床结果增加牙周骨内缺损。方法:招募了五十一个全身健康,不吸烟的受中度至重度慢性牙周炎影响的受试者。受试者有一个深部骨内缺损,探查深度(PD)≥6 mm,并随机分为三组(每组17个受试者)。受试者接受OFD(OFD组),OFD与CS(CS组)或OFD和CM(CM组)手术治疗。手术治疗一年后,进行了完整的临床检查并再次手术。比较了治疗前和治疗后的临床参数,包括PD,临床依从水平(CAL),牙龈退缩(GR)和手术内参数(缺损骨水平[DBL])。结果:1年后,所有评估参数(PD和CAL,P <0.001; GR和DBL,P <0.05)的临床和术中参数在每组中均显示出相对于基线的统计学显着变化。在三组中也观察到差异(PD,CAL和DBL,P <0.001; GR,P <0.05)。与仅使用OFD治疗的受试者相比,CM和CS组的PD,CAL和DBL值明显较小。与OFD组相比,采用再生技术治疗的组的PD降低,CAL和DBL增益明显更高。 CM和CS之间没有发现显着差异。相反,与OFD和CS相比,CM组的GR显着增加。结论:两种再生疗法比单独的OFD产生了更多的临床益处。而且,CS的使用可以使手术后的衰退最小化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号