...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Periodontology >Periodontal regeneration with or without limited orthodontics for the treatment of 2- or 3-wall infrabony defects.
【24h】

Periodontal regeneration with or without limited orthodontics for the treatment of 2- or 3-wall infrabony defects.

机译:牙周再生伴或不伴正畸治疗,用于治疗2或3壁骨缺损。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Limited orthodontics are shown to be effective in the correction of infrabony defects. Studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of using enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) to treat infrabony defects. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of limited orthodontics combined with EMD/DFDBA in the treatment of 2- or 3-wall infrabony defects. METHODS: A randomized, parallel clinical trial was conducted in a private periodontal practice (Tokyo, Japan) between April 2004 and October 2008. Treatment period was 1 year with a 1-year follow-up. Forty-seven randomized patients, mean age of 53 +/- 10.7 years, were allocated into two intervention groups: ortho/EMD/DFDBA (n = 24) and EMD/DFDBA (n = 23). Each patient had either a 2- or 3-wall infrabony defect of >/=6 mm deep. Probing depth and clinical attachment level were measured at baseline and 1 year. The primary outcome measure was absolute change in probing depth and clinical attachment level from baseline to 1-year follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was absolute change in open probing attachment level gain and percentage defect resolution from baseline to 6-month reentry surgery. Infrabony defects were surgically treated with EMD and DFDBA 4 weeks before application of orthodontic extrusive forces. Reentry surgeries were performed at 6 months after initial surgery. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Both treatment groups showed a significant improvement from baseline with no significant difference between the groups except for the 2-wall defects. The ortho/EMD/DFDBA group had statistically significant open probing attachment level gain (95% confidence level, 3.18 to 4.36; P = 0.036) compared to the EMD/DFDBA group (95% confidence level, 2.26 to 3.24) in 2-wall defects. CONCLUSION: Although both treatment modalities were effective in managing 2- or 3-wall infrabony defects, limited orthodontics provided an additional benefit to EMD/DFDBA in 2-wall defects.
机译:背景:有限的正畸治疗被证明对矫正骨下缺损有效。研究还证明了使用脱钙的冻干同种异体骨(DFDBA)和牙釉质基质衍生物(EMD)治疗骨下缺损的有效性。这项研究的目的是比较有限牙齿正畸与EMD / DFDBA联合治疗2或3壁骨缺损的临床疗效。方法:于2004年4月至2008年10月间在日本东京的一家私人牙周诊所进行了一项随机平行临床试验。治疗期为1年,并进行了1年的随访。 47名平均年龄为53 +/- 10.7岁的随机患者被分为两个干预组:邻位/ EMD / DFDBA(n = 24)和EMD / DFDBA(n = 23)。每位患者的2或3壁骨缺损深度均大于等于6毫米。在基线和1年时测量探查深度和临床依恋水平。主要结果指标是从基线到1年随访的探测深度和临床依从性水平的绝对变化。次要结局指标是从基线到6个月的再入手术的开放式探查附件水平增加和缺损率百分比的绝对变化。在应用正畸挤压力之前4周,用EMD和DFDBA手术治疗了骨下缺损。初次手术后6个月进行再入手术。结果:对47例患者进行了分析。两个治疗组均显示出相对于基线的显着改善,除2壁缺损外,两组之间无显着差异。与EMD / DFDBA组(95%置信水平,2.26至3.24)相比,ortho / EMD / DFDBA组在统计学上具有显着的开放探测附件水平增益(95%置信水平,3.18至4.36; P = 0.036)缺陷。结论:尽管两种治疗方式均能有效治疗2或3壁骨缺损,但有限的正畸治疗对2壁缺损的EMD / DFDBA提供了额外的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号