Differential response of human gingival fibroblasts to titanium- and titanium-zirconium-modified surfaces

摘要

Background and Objective: Gingival fibroblasts are responsible for the constant adaptation, wound healing and regeneration of gingival connective tissue. New titanium-zirconium (TiZr) abutment surfaces have been designed to improve soft tissue integration and reduce implant failure compared with titanium (Ti). The aim of the present study was first to characterize a primary human gingival fibroblast (HGF) model and secondly to evaluate their differential response to Ti and TiZr polished (P), machined (M) and machined + acid-etched (modMA) surfaces, respectively. Material and Methods: HGF were cultured on tissue culture plastic or on the different Ti and TiZr surfaces. Cell morphology was evaluated through confocal and scanning electron microscopy. A wound healing assay was performed to evaluate the capacity of HGF to close a scratch. The expression of genes was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR, addressing: (i) extracellular matrix organization and turnover; (ii) inflammation; (iii) cell adhesion and structure; and (iv) wound healing. Finally, cells on Ti/TiZr surfaces were immunostained with anti-ITGB3 antibodies to analyze integrin β3 production. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP1) and inhibitor of metallopeptidases-1 (TIMP1) production were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: On tissue culture plastic, HGF showed no differences between donors on cell proliferation and on the ability for wound closure; α-smooth muscle actin was overexpressed on scratched monolayers. The differentiation profile showed increased production of extracellular matrix components. Ti and TiZr showed similar biocompatibility with HGF. TiZr increased integrin-β3 mRNA and protein levels, compared with Ti. Cells on TiZr surfaces showed higher MMP1 protein than Ti surfaces, although similar TIMP1 protein production. In this in vitro experiment, P and M surfaces from both Ti and TiZr showed better HGF growth than modMA. Conclusion: Taking into account the better mechanical properties and bioactivity of TiZr compared with Ti, the results of the present study show that TiZr is a potential clinical candidate for soft tissue integration and implant success.