...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of perinatology: Official journal of the California Perinatal Association >Does skin cleansing with chlorhexidine affect skin condition, temperature and colonization in hospitalized preterm low birth weight infants?: a randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Does skin cleansing with chlorhexidine affect skin condition, temperature and colonization in hospitalized preterm low birth weight infants?: a randomized clinical trial.

机译:洗必泰清洁皮肤会影响住院的早产低出生体重婴儿的皮肤状况,温度和定植吗?:一项随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine if single skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine affects skin condition, temperature and bacterial colonization in stable preterm (28-36 weeks gestational age) low birth weight (1001-2000 g) infants admitted in a health facility. METHODS: Eligible infants were randomized within 3 h of birth into the following three groups: chlorhexidine, normal saline or no skin cleansing. Infants in the first two groups were wiped once with baby wipes containing either 0.25% chlorhexidine or saline. Skin condition, axillary temperature and skin colonization rates in the axilla and the groin were assessed at specified time intervals after intervention. RESULTS: In all, 60 infants were included in the study (20 in each group). Median skin condition scores at 72 and 168 h after the intervention were 2 and 2, respectively, in all three groups. At 30 min after skin cleansing, two infants each in the chlorhexidine and saline cleansing groups and none in the no cleansing group experienced cold stress (36-36.4 degrees C). There was, however, no difference in mean skin temperature of the groups (36.6 degrees C). At 24 h, skin colonization rates in the axilla were 22.2, 52.7, and 57.9%, respectively, in the chlorhexidine, saline and no cleansing groups (P=0.06); skin cleansing with chlorhexidine reduced the incidence of colonization by 62% compared with no cleansing (relative risk (RR): 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 0.98), but there was no significant reduction when compared with saline cleansing (RR: 0.42; 0.16-1.10). Axillary colonization rates at 72 h and colonization at the groin at 24 and 72 h were not significantly different across the three groups. CONCLUSION: Single skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine did not adversely affect skin condition or temperature in hospitalized preterm infants and reduced axillary-skin colonization at 24 h after the intervention. Trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of such an intervention on the incidence of infections in preterm neonates.
机译:目的:研究在健康设施中接受稳定出生的早产(28-36周胎龄)低出生体重(1001-2000 g)的婴儿,用0.25%洗必泰清洗皮肤是否会影响皮肤状况,温度和细菌定植。方法:将符合条件的婴儿在出生后3小时内随机分为以下三组:洗必太,生理盐水或无需皮肤清洁。前两组婴儿均用含0.25%洗必泰或生理盐水的婴儿湿巾擦拭一次。在干预后的指定时间间隔评估皮肤状况,腋窝温度以及腋窝和腹股沟的皮肤定植率。结果:总共包括60名婴儿(每组20名)。在所有三组中,干预后72和168 h的皮肤状况中位数得分分别为2和2。清洁皮肤后30分钟,洗必泰和生理盐水清洁组各有2名婴儿,无清洁组的无婴出现冷应激(36-36.4摄氏度)。但是,各组的平均皮肤温度没有差异(36.6摄氏度)。在第24小时,洗必泰,生理盐水和无清洁组的腋窝皮肤定植率分别为22.2%,52.7%和57.9%(P = 0.06)。与不清洗相比,用洗必泰清洗皮肤可将定殖率降低62%(相对风险(RR):0.38,95%置信区间(CI):0.15、0.98),但与盐水清洗相比,则没有显着降低( RR:0.42; 0.16-1.10)。在三组中,第72 h的腋窝定植率和第24和72 h的腹股沟定植率无显着差异。结论:用0.25%洗必泰进行单次皮肤清洗不会对住院的早产儿的皮肤状况或温度产生不利影响,并且在干预后24小时内腋窝皮肤的皮肤定植减少。需要进行试验以评估这种干预对早产新生儿感染发生率的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号