...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of perinatology: Official journal of the California Perinatal Association >Treatment strategies to prevent or close a patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants and outcomes.
【24h】

Treatment strategies to prevent or close a patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants and outcomes.

机译:预防或关闭早产儿动脉导管未闭和结局的治疗策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current use of treatments to prevent or treat patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants, examine the association between different treatment strategies and neonatal outcomes and review the variation in these practices between centers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of infants born between 23 and 30 weeks gestation managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group from 1997 to 2004. We collected data on demographics, indomethacin and ligation, and outcomes of the following five groups: prophylactic indomethacin treatment: infants treated with indomethacin on day of life (DOL) 0 or 1; indicated indomethacin treatment: infants treated with indomethacin after DOL 1; PDA without treatment: infants with a PDA without report of treatment; ligation only: infants with a PDA ligation without use of indomethacin and no PDA: infants without a PDA and without treatment. RESULTS: There were 6189 (18%) patients who received prophylactic indomethacin, 5690 (16%) patients received indicated treatment, 3886 (11%) patients had a PDA without treatment, 702 (2%) patients received ligation only and 18 136 (52%) patients had no PDA. In multivariate analysis, mortality among survivors to 2 days of age was lower (odds ratio (OR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 0.7, P<0.01) and chronic lung disease, isolated intestinal perforation and severe retinopathy of prematurity (stages 3 and 4) were higher (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.6, P<0.01; OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0, P<0.01 and 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.6, P<0.01, respectively) in the indicated treatment group compared with the PDA without treatment group. The proportion of infants receiving prophylactic indomethacin among all infants and infants receiving indicated treatment among neonates with a report of a PDA varied by site from 0 to 59% (median 9.5%) and 0 to 100% (median 62%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Indomethacin use for intraventricular hemorrhage prevention and/or treatment of a PDA is common, but the selection of infants for treatment, and the decision of when and how to treat vary widely between centers. Our findings suggest the need for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the effect of treatment of the PDA in preterm infants.
机译:目的:描述目前预防或治疗早产儿动脉导管未闭(PDA)的治疗方法,检查不同治疗策略与新生儿结局之间的关系,并回顾各中心之间这些做法的差异。研究设计:由Pediatrix Medical Group管理的1997年至2004年妊娠23至30周出生的婴儿的队列研究。我们收集了有关人口统计学,吲哚美辛和结扎的数据以及以下五个组的结果:预防性吲哚美辛治疗:接受过吲哚美辛治疗的婴儿消炎痛(DOL)为0或1;指示消炎痛治疗:DOL 1后用消炎痛治疗的婴儿;未治疗的PDA:未治疗的PDA婴儿;仅结扎:不使用消炎痛且不使用PDA的PDA结扎婴儿:不使用PDA且不进行治疗的婴儿。结果:接受预防性消炎痛的患者为6189(18%),接受了指示性治疗的患者为5690(16%),未经治疗的PDA患者为3886(11%),仅结扎的患者为702(2%),有18 136(2)。 52%)患者没有PDA。在多变量分析中,幸存者至2天龄的死亡率较低(优势比(OR)0.6,95%置信区间(CI)0.5至0.7,P <0.01)和慢性肺病,孤立的肠穿孔和严重早产儿视网膜病变(阶段3和4)较高(OR 1.5,95%CI 1.3至1.6,P <0.01; OR 1.5,95%CI 1.1至2.0,P <0.01和1.4,95%CI 1.2至1.6,P <0.01,分别与指定的治疗组和未治疗的PDA进行比较。在所有有PDA报告的新生儿中,接受预防性消炎痛的婴儿比例和接受指示性治疗的婴儿比例分别从0%至59%(中位数9.5%)和0%至100%(中位数62%)不同。结论:吲哚美辛用于预防和/或治疗PDA的脑室内出血是很普遍的,但是各中心之间选择婴儿进行治疗以及何时以及如何治疗的决定各不相同。我们的研究结果表明需要对早产儿PDA的治疗效果进行随机,安慰剂对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号