...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.

机译:使用智能假肢和传统的阻尼膝关节摆动相位控制技术对被截肢者的耗氧量和步态进行比较评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the gait of amputees wearing conventionally damped pneumatic swing-phase control knees and microchip-controlled Intelligent Prostheses. DESIGN: Crossover trial. SETTING: An amputee rehabilitation centre in a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ten established unilateral transfemoral prosthetic users were asked to participate in the trial; all agreed. INTERVENTIONS: The amputees were assessed wearing pneumatic swing-phase control knees and then with the Intelligent Prosthesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxygen consumption while walking at different speeds on a treadmill, video-recording of gait assessed by a panel and temporal-spatial parameters of gait whilst walking at slow, fast or normal speeds in a gait laboratory. RESULTS: Mean oxygen cost for all subjects at 0.69 m/s was 0.33 ml/kg.m with the conventional limb and 0.30 ml/kg.m with the Intelligent Prosthesis (p = 0.01). At 1.25 m/s the mean oxygen cost for the conventional limb was 0.24 ml/kg.m and for the Intelligent Prosthesis was 0.22 ml/kg.m (not significant). The ANOVA analysis showed that oxygen cost was similar at normal walking speeds but increased more at lower speeds for the pneumatic swing-phase control leg compared to the Intelligent Prosthesis (p < 0.02). There were no significant differences in subjective gait evaluation or temporal and spatial gait parameters. CONCLUSION: At lower speeds oxygen cost was lower with the Intelligent Prosthesis. Gait analysis detected no significant changes between the two legs.
机译:目的:比较截肢者的步态,他们采用传统的阻尼气动摆动相位控制膝盖和微芯片控制的智能假肢。设计:交叉试验。地点:教学医院的截肢康复中心。参与者:十名已建立的单侧经股假肢使用者被要求参加试验。全部同意。干预措施:截肢者先通过气动摆动相位控制膝盖进行评估,然后使用智能假肢进行评估。主要观察指标:在跑步机上以不同速度行走时的耗氧量,通过面板评估的步态视频记录以及在步态实验室中以慢,快或正常速度行走时步态的时空参数。结果:所有受试者的平均氧气消耗为0.69 m / s,常规肢体为0.33 ml / kg.m,智能假肢为0.30 ml / kg.m(p = 0.01)。传统肢体的平均氧气消耗为1.25 m / s,为0.24 ml / kg.m,而智能假肢的平均氧气消耗为0.22 ml / kg.m(不明显)。 ANOVA分析表明,与智能假肢相比,气动摆相控制腿在正常步行速度下的氧气成本相似,但在较低速度下的氧气成本增加更多(p <0.02)。主观步态评估或时空步态参数没有显着差异。结论:智能假体在较低的速度下耗氧成本较低。步态分析未发现两条腿之间有明显变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号