首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic trauma >No Difference in Adverse Events Between Surgically Treated Reduced and Unreduced Distal Radius Fractures
【24h】

No Difference in Adverse Events Between Surgically Treated Reduced and Unreduced Distal Radius Fractures

机译:经手术治疗的远端Rad骨骨折复位与未复位的不良事件无差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives:To determine if closed reduction is worthwhile for the subset of patients who choose operative treatment before attempted reduction of their distal radius fracture. We hypothesize that there are no differences in (1) adverse events and (2) subsequent surgeries between patients treated with manipulative reduction compared with those that were splinted without reduction.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Setting:Three affiliated urban hospitals in a single city in the United States.Patients/Participants:One thousand five hundred eleven consecutive adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of their distal radius fracture between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2012, of whom 102 (7%) were not reduced before surgery.Intervention:Manipulative reduction compared with splinting without reduction.Main Outcome Measurements:Adverse events were defined as any infections, hematomas treated operatively, disproportionate finger stiffness, (transient) neuropathology after surgery, delayed carpal tunnel release, malunion, reoperation for loss of alignment, hardware removal, and tendon ruptures within 1 year after surgery. Outcome measures were grouped to determine the overall adverse event rate and subsequent surgery rate.Results:We found no difference in specific adverse events between unreduced and reduced fractures. After adjusting for possible confounding variables by logistic regression, we found no difference in overall rates of adverse events (adjusted odds ratio unreduced fractures 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.67-2.0) and subsequent surgeries (adjusted odds ratio unreduced fractures 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.8).Conclusions:Leaving the fracture unreduced before surgery was not associated with increased adverse events or subsequent surgeries. For patients who make an informed decision to undergo operative treatment for their closed neurovascular intact displaced distal radius fracture, manipulative reduction may not be helpful.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:目的:确定在尝试减少radius骨远端骨折之前选择手术治疗的患者亚组是否值得进行闭合复位。我们假设在进行手法复位治疗的患者与未进行复位治疗的患者之间(1)不良事件和(2)后续手术之间没有差异。设计:回顾性队列研究背景:单个城市中的三家附属城市医院患者/参加者:2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日之间,连续151例成人接受radius骨远端复位并internal骨远端内固定的成人患者,其中102例(7%)未接受干预措施:与夹板而不复位相比,手术减少。主要指标:不良事件定义为:任何感染,手术治疗的血肿,手指僵硬程度过高,手术后(短暂的)神经病理学,腕管释放延迟,畸形愈合,再次手术手术后1年内失去对准,去除硬件和腱断裂。结果措施被分组以确定总体不良事件发生率和随后的手术发生率。结果:我们发现未减少和减少的骨折在特定不良事件方面没有差异。通过logistic回归调整可能的混杂变量后,我们发现不良事件的总体发生率(调整后的比值未减少的骨折1.2,95%置信区间0.67-2.0)和随后的手术(调整后的比值比未减少的骨折0.65,95%置信度)没有差异区间0.23-1.8)。结论:手术前未减少骨折与不良事件增加或后续手术无关。对于因知情而决定对其闭合的神经血管完整移位的远端distal骨骨折进行手术治疗的患者,手法复位可能无济于事。证据水平:治疗水平III。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号