首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic trauma >Anatomic Fixation of Supination External Rotation Type IV Equivalent Ankle Fractures
【24h】

Anatomic Fixation of Supination External Rotation Type IV Equivalent Ankle Fractures

机译:旋旋外旋IV型等效踝关节骨折的解剖固定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives:To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of supination external rotation type IV equivalent (SER IV E) ankle fractures (AO/OTA classification 44-B2.1) treated with transsyndesmotic screw fixation with those treated with deltoid and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) repair.Design:Case series and single-surgeon retrospective analysis of a prospective database.Setting:Academic level I trauma center.Patients:Forty-five SER IV E ankle fractures fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria with at least 12 months of radiographic follow-up.Intervention:Deltoid and PITFL repair in addition to lateral malleolus fixation compared with transsyndesmotic screw fixation.Main Outcome Measurements:Syndesmotic reduction compared with contralateral extremity on a postoperative computed tomography scan and maintenance of reduction based on final postoperative radiographs [medial clear space (MCS) and tibiofibular clear space (TCS)].Results:There was no significant difference in mean postoperative TCS, MCS, or change in TCS or MCS between the cohorts. The anatomic treatment group had significantly better postoperative syndesmotic reduction compared with the transsyndesmotic cohort (7.4% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.02). Fourteen patients in the transsyndesmotic screw cohort underwent removal compared with 3 patients in the anatomic cohort who required secondary procedures. The transsyndesmotic screw cohort had statistically significant better mean dorsiflexion of ankle (mean 20 vs. 17 degrees; P = 0.02).Conclusions:This comparison of treatment strategies for SER IV E ankle fractures has shown an improvement in immediate postoperative syndesmotic reduction and the elimination of reoperation for removal of transsyndesmotic screws in patients treated with PITFL repair. Previous research has shown a good correlation between functional outcomes and syndesmotic reduction; however, further investigation into the functional outcomes of these patients is necessary to determine the future clinical impact of this anatomic fixation strategy.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:目的:比较经经突突螺钉固定治疗的旋后外旋IV型(SER IV E)踝关节骨折(AO / OTA分类44-B2.1)与经三角肌和后下胫腓韧带(PITFL)治疗的放射学和临床结果修复:设计:病例数据库和单手术外科医生对前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析设置:学术水平I创伤中心患者:45例SER IV E踝关节骨折符合所有入选/排除标准,至少需要进行12个月的影像学随访干预:与外侧股骨外固定相比,与经突突螺钉固定相比,还进行了Deltoid和PITFL修复。主要结果测量:根据最终的术后X线照片,在术后计算机体层摄影术上进行与联合对侧肢体置换相比的联合降突,并根据最终的术后X线片[内部净空间]进行复位(MCS)和胫腓间隙(TCS)]。结果:无明显差异平均术后TCS,MCS或队列之间TCS或MCS的变化。解剖治疗组与经联合手术组相比,术后经联合手术组的复位明显更好(7.4%vs. 33.3%; P = 0.02)。经突触联合螺钉组的14例患者接受了切除,而解剖学队列中的3例需要进行二次手术。经突触联合螺钉组的踝平均背屈在统计学上有显着改善(平均20度vs.17度; P = 0.02)。结论:对SER IV E踝部骨折的治疗策略的比较显示,术后即刻复位并消除了联合突突修复PITFL修复患者的经突突螺钉切除术。先前的研究表明,功能预后与联合降压之间有良好的相关性。然而,有必要进一步研究这些患者的功能结局,以确定这种解剖固定策略对未来的临床影响。证据级别:治疗级别III。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号