首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oral rehabilitation >Comparison of applying particulate demineralized bone matrix (DBM), putty DBM and open flap debridement in periodontal horizontal bone defects. A 12-month longitudinal, multi-center, triple-blind, split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical study. Part 1 - clinical and radiographic evaluation.
【24h】

Comparison of applying particulate demineralized bone matrix (DBM), putty DBM and open flap debridement in periodontal horizontal bone defects. A 12-month longitudinal, multi-center, triple-blind, split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical study. Part 1 - clinical and radiographic evaluation.

机译:在牙周水平骨缺损中应用颗粒状脱钙骨基质(DBM),腻子DBM和开放皮瓣清创术的比较。为期12个月的纵向,多中心,三盲,裂口,随机对照临床研究。第1部分-临床和放射学评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Putty form graft materials may have additional favourable effects when compared with particulate ones in periodontal bone defects. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and also radiographic changes following application of (i) putty form demineralized bone matrix (DBM), (ii) particulate form DBM and (iii) open flap debridement (control), using modified curtain suturing technique in the treatment of interproximal suprabony (horizontal) defects. Twenty-five chronic periodontitis patients with 125 sites (radiologically >or=4 mm horizontal bone defect) were selected to participate in this triple-blind, split mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Putty and particulate form DBM grafts were placed at experimental sites. Clinical measurements included probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), gingival recession and bone probing depth (BPD) were made at baseline and repeated 12 months after the operations. Standardized digital radiographs were also taken to measure radiographic bone level (RBL) at baseline and 12 months later to be compared in a software. Probing depth reductions and RAL gains were significantly improved in all treatment groups (P < 0.001). No significant differences in soft tissue parameters were found among three groups (P > 0.05). Bone probing depth measurements indicated comparable significant bone gain in graft applied groups (P < 0.01) and a significant bone resorption in open flap debridement group (P < 0.01). Radiographic evaluation did not show any significant bone gain or resorption in all treatment groups (P > 0.05). The results of this study indicate that either putty or particulate DBM demonstrates similar enhancements in soft and hard tissue parameters. Applying putty or particulate form DBM results with slight bone formation when compared with open flap debridement in horizontal bone defects at 1-year post-operative examination according to BPD measurements.
机译:当与牙周骨缺损中的颗粒状移植物相比时,腻子状移植物材料可能具有额外的有利作用。这项研究的目的是评估使用改良的幕布缝合技术应用(i)腻子形式的脱矿骨基质(DBM),(ii)颗粒形式的DBM和(iii)开放皮瓣清创术(对照)后的临床及影像学改变在近端跨上(水平)缺损的治疗中。选择了25个具有125个部位(放射学上≥4 mm的水平骨缺损)的慢性牙周炎患者参加了这项三盲,双口,随机,对照临床试验。将油灰和颗粒状DBM移植物放置在实验位置。临床测量包括在基线时进行探查深度(PD),相对附着水平(RAL),牙龈退缩和骨探查深度(BPD),并在术后12个月重复进行。还使用标准的数字X射线照片测量基线和12个月后的射线照相骨水平(RBL),并在软件中进行比较。在所有治疗组中,探查深度减少和RAL增益均得到显着改善(P <0.001)。三组之间在软组织参数方面无显着差异(P> 0.05)。骨探查深度的测量结果表明,移植物应用组的骨吸收量相当(P <0.01),开放皮瓣清创术组的骨吸收量显着(P <0.01)。影像学评估未显示所有治疗组的骨吸收或吸收均显着增加(P> 0.05)。这项研究的结果表明,腻子或微粒DBM在软组织和硬组织参数方面均表现出类似的增强作用。根据BPD测量结果,在术后1年的检查中,与水平骨缺损的开放皮瓣清创术相比,使用腻子或微粒形式的DBM会导致轻微的骨形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号