...
首页> 外文期刊>Cell and tissue banking: An international journal of banking, engineering & transplantation of cells and tissues >Clinical and radiographic evaluation of amnion chorion membrane and demineralized bone matrix putty allograft for management of periodontal intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of amnion chorion membrane and demineralized bone matrix putty allograft for management of periodontal intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial

机译:牙龈绒毛膜膜和脱矿质骨基质腻子同种异体移植治疗牙周肠道缺陷的临床和放射线评价:随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this trial was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of amnion chorion membrane (ACM) with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in a putty form in management of periodontal intrabony defects. Twenty-two participants with severe chronic periodontitis and intrabony defects, were randomly assigned in two equal parallel groups. Each group was treated with open flap debridement (OFD) and ACM or OFD and DBM putty. Plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic measurement of bone defect area (BDA) were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Both ACM and DBM putty demonstrated significant improvement in all clinical and radiographic outcomes at 6 months compared to baseline values. However, no significant difference was observed between the two treatment modalities when compared at different time intervals. Six months postoperatively, ACM showed 3.18 +/- 0.85 mm, PD reduction and 2.25 +/- 0.75 mm CAL gain, while DBM putty revealed 3.45 +/- 1.08 mm PD reduction and 2.73 +/- 0.85 mm CAL gain. Radiographic assessment showed that mean baseline BDA for ACM group was 10.39 +/- 3.86 mm(2), which significantly reduced to 5.21 +/- 2.38 after 6 months. Mean BDA mm(2) in DBM putty group also significantly improved after 6 months, 5.35 +/- 3.63 mm(2) when compared to baseline values 9.80 +/- 5.77 mm(2). Both ACM barrier and DBM putty allograft provided significant improvement in clinical and radiographic outcomes after 6 months, yet no significant differences were noticed between them. This trial implied that both biomaterials have a potential regenerative capacity in treating periodontal intrabony defects.
机译:该试验的目的是将羊膜绒毛膜(ACM)的临床和放射线显影结果以牙周胸腺缺陷的腻子形式以腻子形式进行比较。 22名参与者具有严重的慢性牙周炎和肠缺陷,随机分配在两个相等的平行组中。每组都用开放式襟翼清创(OFD)和ACM或DBM Putty治疗。在术后3和6个月内记录了骨缺损区域(BDA)的斑块指数,牙龈指数,口袋深度(PD),临床附着级别(CAL)和射线照相测量。与基线值相比,ACM和DBM Butty均表现出6个月的所有临床和射线照相结果的显着改善。然而,在不同时间间隔比较时,两种治疗方式之间没有观察到显着差异。术后六个月,ACM显示3.18 +/- 0.85毫米,降低减少和2.25 +/- 0.75毫米CAL收益,而DBM Putty揭示了3.45 +/- 1.08 mm PD减少和2.73 +/- 0.85 mm Cal增益。射线照相评估表明,ACM组的平均基线BDA为10.39 +/- 3.86 mm(2),6个月后明显减少到5.21 +/- 2.38。与基线值9.80 +/- 5.77 mm(2)相比,DBM Putty组中的平均BDA mm(2)在6个月后,5.35 +/- 3.63 mm(2)。 ACM屏障和DBM Putty同种异体移植术均在6个月后临床和射线照相结果提供了显着的改善,但它们之间没有明显差异。该试验暗示两种生物材料都有潜在的再生能力治疗牙周患有患有型疾病的缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号