首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic science : >Percutaneous compression plate versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomized study
【24h】

Percutaneous compression plate versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomized study

机译:经皮加压钢板与股骨近端抗旋转钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The treatment and management of hip fracture poses a great challenge for clinicians in osteology and surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods: A prospective randomized study was carried out from January 2008 to October 2011 involving 90 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures (90 hips) who underwent minimally invasive surgery using the PCCP or PFNA. Evaluation variables, including operation time, intra- and perioperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and final clinical outcomes by the end of follow-up, were used to compare the benefits of these two implants. Results: Among 90 subjects, 45 received PCCPs and 45 received PFNAs. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The median follow-up time was 16.9 months (12-24 months). In the PCCP group, the mean operative time was 53 min (40-75 min), and the mean intra- and perioperative blood losses were 100.7 ml (60-150 ml) and 916 ml (433-1339 ml), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the PFNA group. Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and final clinical outcomes including pain complaints, range of motion of the hip, postoperative hip function at 12 months, and the recovery of walking ability to pre-injury status between these two implants. Conclusions: Overall, the PCCP and PFNA appear to have similar clinical effects in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures, although the PCCP provided shorter operation times and less blood loss than PFNA. Both implants discussed were demonstrated to be ideal for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
机译:背景:髋部骨折的治疗和处理对骨科和外科临床医生提出了巨大的挑战。这项研究的目的是比较经皮加压钢板(PCCP)与股骨近端抗旋转钉(PFNA)在治疗老年患者股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。方法:从2008年1月至2011年10月进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,研究对象为90例老年股骨转子间骨折(90髋)患者,他们使用PCCP或PFNA进行了微创手术。评估变量包括手术时间,术中和围手术期失血量,住院时间,术后并发症发生率以及随访结束时的最终临床结局,用于比较这两种植入物的益处。结果:在90位受试者中,有45位接受了PCCP,而45位接受了PFNA。两组的基线特征具有可比性。中位随访时间为16.9个月(12-24个月)。在PCCP组中,平均手术时间为53分钟(40-75分钟),平均术中和围手术期失血量分别为100.7 ml(60-150 ml)和916 ml(433-1339 ml),明显低于PFNA组。然而,这两种植入物的术后并发症发生率和最终临床结果(包括疼痛症状,髋关节活动范围,术后12个月的髋关节功能以及行走能力恢复至损伤前状态)的恢复率均无统计学差异。 。结论:总体而言,尽管PCCP与PFNA相比提供了更短的手术时间和更少的失血,但PCCP和PFNA在治疗老年转子间骨折患者中具有相似的临床效果。讨论的两种植入物均被证明是治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折的理想选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号