首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic research >Does a tensioning device pinned to the tibia improve knee anterior-posterior load-displacement compared to manual tensioning of the graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A cadaveric study of two tibial fixation devices.
【24h】

Does a tensioning device pinned to the tibia improve knee anterior-posterior load-displacement compared to manual tensioning of the graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A cadaveric study of two tibial fixation devices.

机译:与在前交叉韧带重建后手动张紧移植物相比,固定在胫骨上的张紧装置是否可以改善膝关节的前后位移?对两个胫骨固定装置的尸体研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Devices that are pinned to the tibia to tension an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft produce joint reaction loads that in turn can affect the maintenance of graft initial tension after tibial fixation and hence knee anterior-posterior (AP) load-displacement. However, the effect of these devices on AP load-displacement is unknown. Our objectives were to determine whether tensioning by device versus tensioning by hand causes differences in AP load-displacement and intraarticular graft tension for two commonly used tibial fixation devices: a bioresorbable interference screw and a WasherLoc. AP load-displacement and intraarticular graft tension were measured in 20 cadaveric knees using a custom arthrometer. An initial tension of 110 N was applied to a double-looped tendon graft with the knee at extension using a tensioning device pinned to the tibia and a simulated method of tensioning by hand. After inserting the tibial fixation device, the 134 N anterior limit (i.e., anterior position of the tibia with respect to the femur with a 134 N anterior force applied to the tibia) and 0 N posterior limit (i.e., AP position of the tibia relative to the femur with a 0 N force applied to the tibia) were measured with the knee in 25 degrees flexion. Intraarticular graft tension was measured at extension. These limits and intraarticular graft tension were also measured after cyclically loading the knee 300 times. Compared to a simulated method of tensioning by hand, tensioning with a device pinned to the tibia did not decrease the 134 N anterior limit and did not cause posterior tibial translation. However, intraarticular graft tension was maintained better with a tensioning device pinned to the tibia for the Washerloc, but not the interference screw. For two commonly used tibial fixation devices, a tensioning device pinned to the tibia does not improve AP load-displacement at 25 degrees flexion over tensioning by hand when the graft is tensioned at full extension, but does improve the maintenance of intraarticular graft tension for the Washerloc.
机译:固定在胫骨上以张紧前交叉韧带(ACL)移植物的装置会产生关节反应负荷,继而会影响胫骨固定后移植物初始张力的维持,从而影响膝关节前后位移(AP)。但是,这些设备对AP负载位移的影响尚不清楚。我们的目标是确定两种常用的胫骨固定装置:可生物吸收的干涉螺钉和WasherLoc,是通过设备张紧还是用手张紧引起AP负荷-位移和关节内移植物张紧力的差异。使用定制关节镜在20个尸体膝盖中测量AP负荷位移和关节内移植物张力。使用固定在胫骨上的张紧装置和手工张紧的模拟方法,将110 N的初始张紧力施加到双环腱移植物上,膝盖伸直。插入胫骨固定装置后,向前限制134 N(即,胫骨相对于股骨的前向位置,向胫骨施加134 N的前向力),向后限制0 N(即,胫骨相对的AP位置)在膝盖屈曲25度的情况下,将0 N力施加到胫骨上)。在延伸时测量关节内移植物张力。在循环加载膝盖300次后,还测量了这些极限值和关节内移植物的张力。与手动张紧的模拟方法相比,用固定在胫骨上的器械张紧不会降低134 N的前限,也不会引起胫骨后平移。但是,使用固定在胫骨上的Washerloc固定的张紧装置可以更好地保持关节内移植物的张力,而不能使用干涉螺钉。对于两个常用的胫骨固定装置,固定在胫骨上的张紧装置不会比完全拉伸时的手动张紧改善25度屈曲时的AP负荷-位移,但是确实改善了对于Washerloc。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号