...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry >Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:植物性和最小意识状态下的保留意识:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Active, passive and resting state paradigms using functional MRI (fMRI) or EEG may reveal consciousness in the vegetative (VS) and the minimal conscious state (MCS). A meta-analysis was performed to assess the prevalence of preserved consciousness in VS and MCS as revealed by fMRI and EEG, including command following (active paradigms), cortical functional connectivity elicited by external stimuli (passive paradigms) and default mode networks (resting state). Studies were selected from multiple indexing databases until February 2015 and evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. 37 studies were identified, including 1041 patients (mean age 43 years, range 16-89; male/female 2.1: 1; 39.5% traumatic brain injuries). MCS patients were more likely than VS patients to follow commands during active paradigms (32% vs 14%; OR 2.85 (95% CI 1.90 to 4.27; p<0.0001)) and to show preserved functional cortical connectivity during passive paradigms (55% vs 26%; OR 3.53 (95% CI 2.49 to 4.99; p<0.0001)). Passive paradigms suggested preserved consciousness more often than active paradigms (38% vs 24%; OR 1.98 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.54; p<0.0001)). Data on resting state paradigms were insufficient for statistical evaluation. In conclusion, active paradigms may underestimate the degree of consciousness as compared to passive paradigms. While MCS patients show signs of preserved consciousness more frequently in both paradigms, roughly 15% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of VS are able to follow commands by modifying their brain activity. However, there remain important limitations at the single-subject level; for example, patients from both categories may show command following despite negative passive paradigms.
机译:使用功能性MRI(fMRI)或EEG的主动,被动和休息状态范例可以揭示植物人(VS)和最低意识状态(MCS)的意识。进行荟萃分析以评估功能磁共振成像和脑电图所揭示的VS和MCS意识保留的患病率,包括命令遵循(主动范式),外部刺激(被动范式)和默认模式网络(静止状态)引起的皮质功能连接性)。从多个索引数据库中选择研究,直至2015年2月,并使用“诊断准确性研究的质量评估” -2进行评估。确定了37项研究,包括1041例患者(平均年龄43岁,范围16-89;男性/女性2.1:1; 39.5%的颅脑外伤)。 MCS患者比VS患者更有可能在主动范例中遵循命令(32%vs 14%; OR 2.85(95%CI 1.90至4.27; p <0.0001))并在被动范例中表现出保留的功能性皮质连接性(55%vs 26%; OR 3.53(95%CI 2.49至4.99; p <0.0001)。被动范例建议保持意识比主动范例更多(38%vs 24%; OR 1.98(95%CI 1.54至2.54; p <0.0001))。静止状态范例的数据不足以进行统计评估。总之,与被动范例相比,主动范例可能低估了意识的程度。尽管MCS患者在两种范例中都更经常地显示出意识保持的迹象,但是大约15%的临床诊断为VS的患者能够通过改变其大脑活动来遵循命令。但是,在单学科水平上仍然存在重要的局限性。例如,尽管消极的消极范例,两种类别的患者都可能会显示命令遵循。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号