...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurology >Comparison of interferon beta products and azathioprine in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
【24h】

Comparison of interferon beta products and azathioprine in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

机译:干扰素β产品和硫唑嘌呤治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the relative efficacy of interferon beta (IFNbeta) products and azathioprine (AZA) in the treatment of relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Ninety-four previously untreated patients of short duration with RRMS were randomly allocated to the two treatment groups. The first group received IFNbeta products (Betaferon,Avonex or Rebif); the second group received AZA for 12 months. Response to treatment was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting therapy. The mean number of relapse during one year of the study was lower in the AZA group than in the IFNbeta products group (0.28 vs. 0.64, P < 0.05).After 12 months, 57.4% of patients receiving IFNbeta products remained relapse free compared with 76.6% of those given AZA. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) decreased by 0.30 units in IFNbeta-treated patients (P < 0.05) and 0.46 in AZAtreated patients (P < 0.001). Treatment with IFNbeta products and AZA significantly reduces the relapse rate and EDSS score in patients with RRMS, while AZA is more effective than the IFNbeta formulations.
机译:我们比较了干扰素β(IFNbeta)产品和硫唑嘌呤(AZA)在复发性多发性硬化症(RRMS)治疗中的相对疗效。 94名先前未接受过RRMS短期治疗的患者被随机分配到两个治疗组中。第一组接受IFNbeta产品(贝塔芬,Avonex或Rebif);第二组接受AZA治疗12个月。在开始治疗后的3、6和12个月评估对治疗的反应。在研究的一年中,AZA组的平均复发次数低于IFNbeta产品组(0.28 vs.0.64,P <0.05)。在12个月后,接受IFNbeta产品的患者中57.4%的患者仍无复发接受AZA治疗者占76.6%。扩大的残障状态量表(EDSS)在接受IFNbeta治疗的患者中降低了0.30个单位(P <0.05),在接受AZA治疗的患者中降低了0.46个单位(P <0.001)。 IFNbeta产品和AZA的治疗可显着降低RRMS患者的复发率和EDSS评分,而AZA比IFNbeta制剂更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号