首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain and symptom management. >The cost-effectiveness of the decision to hospitalize nursing home residents with advanced dementia
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of the decision to hospitalize nursing home residents with advanced dementia

机译:老年痴呆症住院疗养院住院决策的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Nursing home (NH) residents with advanced dementia commonly experience burdensome and costly hospitalizations that may not extend survival or improve quality of life. Cost-effectiveness analyses of decisions to hospitalize these residents have not been reported. Objectives: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of 1) not having a do-not-hospitalize (DNH) order and 2) hospitalization for suspected pneumonia in NH residents with advanced dementia. Methods: NH residents from 22 NHs in the Boston area were followed in the Choices, Attitudes, and Strategies for Care of Advanced Dementia at the End-of-Life study conducted between February 2003 and February 2009. We conducted cost-effectiveness analyses of aggressive treatment strategies for advanced dementia residents living in NHs when they suffer from acute illness. Primary outcome measures included quality-adjusted life days (QALD) and quality-adjusted life years, Medicare expenditures, and incremental net benefits (INBs) over 15 months. Results: Compared with a less aggressive strategy of avoiding hospital transfer (i.e., having DNH orders), the strategy of hospitalization was associated with an incremental increase in Medicare expenditures of $5972 and an incremental gain in quality-adjusted survival of 3.7 QALD. Hospitalization for pneumonia was associated with an incremental increase in Medicare expenditures of $3697 and an incremental reduction in quality-adjusted survival of 9.7 QALD. At a willingness-to-pay level of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years, the INBs of the more aggressive treatment strategies were negative and, therefore, not cost effective (INB for not having a DNH order, -$4958 and INB for hospital transfer for pneumonia, -$6355). Conclusion: Treatment strategies favoring hospitalization for NH residents with advanced dementia are not cost effective.
机译:背景:患有老年痴呆症的疗养院(NH)居民通常会承受沉重且昂贵的住院费用,这可能无法延长生存期或改善生活质量。尚未报告对这些居民住院决策的成本效益分析。目的:评估1)患有老年痴呆症的NH居民中不接受住院治疗(DNH)和2)住院治疗疑似肺炎的成本效益。方法:在2003年2月至2009年2月进行的生命终止研究中,追踪了波士顿地区22个NH的NH居民的选择,态度和护理晚期痴呆的策略。我们对侵略性进行了成本效益分析NHs患有急性疾病的晚期痴呆症居民的治疗策略。主要结局指标包括质量调整生命日(QALD)和质量调整生命年,Medicare支出以及15个月内递增的净收益(INB)。结果:与避免医院转移的较不积极的策略(即拥有DNH订单)相比,住院策略与Medicare支出的增量增加$ 5972和质量调整的生存的增量增加3.7 QALD有关。肺炎的住院治疗与3697美元的医疗保险支出增加和9.7 QALD的质量调整生存期减少有关。在愿意支付的100,000美元/质量调整生命年的支付水平下,较积极的治疗策略的INB呈负数,因此不具成本效益(INB没有DNH订单,-$ 4958和INB用于医院转诊肺炎,-$ 6355)。结论:有利于晚期痴呆的NH住院治疗的治疗策略并不划算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号