...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Combined analysis of two randomized trials of community physiotherapy for patients more than one year post stroke.
【24h】

Combined analysis of two randomized trials of community physiotherapy for patients more than one year post stroke.

机译:对中风后一年以上患者进行的两项社区物理治疗随机试验的综合分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Some patients continue to have mobility problems as a long-term consequence of stroke and it is unclear whether routine, further contact with a physiotherapy service is beneficial. Two single-centre, randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy for patients more than one year post stroke have been undertaken in Oxford and Bradford in the UK and the results from these two trials have been combined to give a more precise estimate of effectiveness. METHOD: The computerized databases from both trials were combined for a joint analysis. Outcome measures common to both trials were: Rivermead Mobility Index; gait speed measured over 10 metres; Barthel Index; Frenchay Activities Index; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: There were 264 patients available for the combined analysis (Oxford = 94; Bradford = 170). There was a significant but clinically small improvement in mobility at three months in the combined treatment group measured by the Rivermead Mobility Index (median of the differences = 0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 1); interpolated values = 0.43 (95% CI 0.08, 0.80)) and gait speed (treatment effect 2.7 m/min (95% CI 0.94, 4.46)). There were no other significant differences. Intervention given in both studies was at the discretion of the physiotherapists and was of similar and low intensity (mean visits Oxford = 4 (SD 2.5); Bradford = 5 (SD 4.5)). CONCLUSION: A more effective physiotherapy intervention is required for stroke patients with persisting mobility problems after stroke.
机译:背景:由于中风的长期后果,一些患者继续存在行动不便的问题,尚不清楚常规,进一步接触物理治疗服务是否有益。在英国的牛津和布拉德福德进行了两项针对中风后一年以上患者的物理疗法的单中心,随机对照试验,并且将这两项试验的结果进行了合并,以更准确地评估疗效。方法:将两个试验的计算机数据库进行合并分析。两项试验共有的结果指标为:Rivermead流动性指数;步态速度超过10米;巴塞尔指数法国活动指数;医院焦虑和抑郁量表。结果:有264例患者可用于综合分析(牛津= 94;布拉德福德= 170)。通过Rivermead移动指数测量,联合治疗组在三个月的移动中有显着但临床上很小的改善(差异的中位数= 0(95%置信区间(CI)0,1);插值= 0.43(95) %CI 0.08,0.80)和步态速度(治疗效果2.7 m / min(95%CI 0.94,4.46))。没有其他显着差异。两项研究中的干预均由物理治疗师酌情决定,且干预强度相似且强度低(平均访视牛津= 4(SD 2.5);布拉德福德= 5(SD 4.5))。结论:中风后存在持续性活动障碍的中风患者需要更有效的理疗干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号