首页> 外文期刊>Journal of motor behavior >Which version/variation of fitts law? A critique of information-theory models
【24h】

Which version/variation of fitts law? A critique of information-theory models

机译:菲茨法的哪个版本/版本?对信息理论模型的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Four different versions of Fitts law have been in use over many years in the ergonomics, psychology, and HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) fields. There appears to have been no critical discussion of the validity of these different versions. The question is asked: Is one better or more valid than others? The aim of this article was to evaluate these commonly used versions and attempt to determine the correct/more valid model. It is concluded that the original form developed by P. M. Fitts (1954) and P. M. Fitts and J. R. Peterson (1964) is the most valid form based on information theory and that the theoretical foundation of the Shannon version suggested by I. S. MacKenzie (1989) is invalid. A version due to A. T. Welford (1968) also has a valid information-theory basis.
机译:多年来,在人体工程学,心理学和HCI(人机交互)领域中已经使用了四种不同版本的Fitts法。对于这些不同版本的有效性似乎没有进行严格的讨论。问一个问题:一个比另一个更好或更有效吗?本文的目的是评估这些常用版本,并尝试确定正确/更有效的模型。结论是,基于信息理论,由PM Fitts(1954)和PM Fitts和JR Peterson(1964)提出的原始形式是最有效的形式,IS MacKenzie(1989)提出的香农版本的理论基础是无效的。 A. T. Welford(1968)提出的版本也具有有效的信息理论基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号