...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health psychology >Work-related treatment for major depressive disorder and incapacity to work: Preliminary findings of a controlled, matched study
【24h】

Work-related treatment for major depressive disorder and incapacity to work: Preliminary findings of a controlled, matched study

机译:与工作有关的重度抑郁症和无工作能力的治疗:对照研究的初步发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of work-related cognitive-behavioral treatment (W-CBT) with that of cognitive-behavioral treatment as usual (CBT-AU) for employees on sick leave as a result of a major depressive disorder (MDD). We collected data for 26 matched outpatients at preand posttreatment, as well as at 1-year follow-up. Outcome measures were the days of incapacity to work (DIW) as well as self-report measures (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], Symptom Checklist 90-R [GSI], Life Satisfaction Questionnaire [FLZ]). We analyzed data with hierarchical linear modeling in a 2-level model. Therapy effects were defined in 3 ways: effect size (ES), response (based on the reliable change index), and remission compared with the general population's symptom level. The DIW were reduced significantly after both types of treatment, but employees showed even fewer DIW after W-CBT. At follow-up, significantly more employees were working as a result of W-CBT than with CBT-AU. Significant improvements on scores of self-rating measures corresponded with moderate-to-large effect sizes for both treatment types. Approximately 2 thirds of the treated employees were categorized as unimpaired on BDI scores at posttreatment and at follow-up. At least 1 half of the employees were classified as unimpaired on GSI scores at both assessment points. In future research, a randomized controlled trial should be conducted using a larger sample size to investigate the impact of moderators (e.g., employees at different branches of the company). Findings provided support for using common CBT techniques to enhance return to work without losing expected improvements at the symptom level.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较与工作相关的认知行为治疗(W-CBT)与照常进行的认知行为治疗(CBT-AU)对于因严重抑郁症而请病假的员工的有效性(MDD)。我们收集了26名匹配的门诊患者在治疗前后以及1年随访中的数据。结果指标是无工作能力的日子(DIW)以及自我报告的指标(贝克抑郁量表[BDI],症状清单90-R [GSI],生活满意度调查表[FLZ])。我们在2级模型中使用分层线性建模来分析数据。通过三种方式定义治疗效果:效果大小(ES),响应(基于可靠的变化指数)和与普通人群症状水平相比的缓解。两种类型的治疗后,DIW均显着降低,但员工接受W-CBT后的DIW更少。在后续行动中,与CBT-AU相比,使用W-CBT进行工作的员工要多得多。两种治疗类型的自评指标得分的显着提高与中到大型效应值相对应。在治疗后和随访中,约三分之二的受治疗雇员被归类为BDI分数未受损。在两个评估点,至少有一半的员工被归类为GSI分数未受损。在以后的研究中,应使用更大的样本量进行随机对照试验,以调查主持人(例如公司不同分支机构的员工)的影响。调查结果为使用常见的CBT技术提高工作回报率提供了支持,而不会在症状级别上造成预期的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号