首页> 外文期刊>Clinical research and regulatory affairs. >Evaluating the impacts of the FDA's guidance for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measures on clinical trial-based approved drug product labeling claims, 2006-2014
【24h】

Evaluating the impacts of the FDA's guidance for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measures on clinical trial-based approved drug product labeling claims, 2006-2014

机译:评估FDA的患者报告结果(PRO)措施指南对基于临床试验的已批准药品标签声明的影响,2006-2014年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The FDA's Guidance for Industry, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims (i.e. "PRO Guidance"; 2009) outlines the agency's perspectives on how PRO measures, used to support efficacy end-points in therapeutics clinical trial programs, may be evaluated by the FDA. Prior reviews have attempted to identify PRO-based statements in product labels in order to evaluate the potential impacts of the PRO guidance on the rate of approvals of PRO-based claims, but none have been enacted after 2010. An in-depth search identified drug product labels approved by the FDA from January 2006 through to December 2014, with efficacy statements supported by PRO measures. Drug product labels were sorted by chemical type and year of approval, and the differences between time periods before and after the finalization of the PRO Guidance were reviewed with statistical tests. Results showed a reduction in the overall approvals of label-based efficacy statements supported by PRO measures after 2009, which may indicate that fewer phase 3 clinical trial programs have met agency benchmarks for the inclusion of subjective assessments as primary or secondary end-points in support of therapeutic efficacy.
机译:FDA的行业指南,患者报告的结果(PRO)措施:在医疗产品开发中用于支持标签声明(即“ PRO指南”; 2009年)概述了该机构对PRO措施如何用于支持药物疗效终点的观点。治疗性临床试验计划,可以由FDA进行评估。先前的审查试图在产品标签中识别基于PRO的声明,以评估PRO指南对基于PRO的声明的批准率的潜在影响,但在2010年之后没有颁布。产品标签由FDA从2006年1月至2014年12月批准,功效声明由PRO措施支持。按照化学类型和批准年份对药品标签进行分类,并通过统计测试对PRO指南最终定稿之前和之后的时间段进行比较。结果显示,2009年之后,由PRO措施支持的基于标签的功效声明的总体批准减少,这可能表明更少的3期临床试验计划达到了机构基准,以将主观评估作为主要或次要终点纳入支持疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号