...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health >An effective quarantine measure reduced the total incidence of influenza A H1N1 in the workplace: another way to control the H1N1 flu pandemic.
【24h】

An effective quarantine measure reduced the total incidence of influenza A H1N1 in the workplace: another way to control the H1N1 flu pandemic.

机译:有效的隔离措施可减少工作场所中甲型H1N1流感的总发生率:这是控制H1N1流感大流行的另一种方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a non-vaccine quarantine measure against pandemic influenza A H1N1 in workplaces. METHODS: Design was quasi-cluster randomized controlled trial in two sibling companies (Cohort 1 n=6,634, Cohort 2 n=8,500). The follow-up period was from July 1st, 2009 to February 19th, 2010 (233 days). Intervention was voluntary waiting at home on full pay if the family became Influenza like Illness (ILI). The incidences of influenza A H1N1 and those of the subgroups whose families got ILI in both cohorts were compared by a Cox regression model and log-rank test. RESULTS: There were 189 and 270 workers who got H1N1 infection during the follow-up period in each cohort. In this period 317 workers in Cohort 1 were asked to wait at home for several days (100% obeyed). The intervention group (Cohort 1) showed a statistically significant lower risk (p for log-rank test=0.033) compared with the control (Cohort 2), and the hazard ratio of the intervention was 0.799 [0.658-0.970] after adjusting for age, sex, BMI and smoking status. The workers who were asked to wait at home showed H1N1 infection more frequently (49 out of 317) compared with the workers whose family got ILI but were not asked to wait and work regularly (77 out of 990, RR=2.17 [1.48-3.18]). CONCLUSIONS: The waiting on full pay policy in the workplace reduced the overall risk of influenza A H1N1 by about 20% in one flu season in Japan. This kind of non-vaccine measure will be a promising option in workplaces to control the next flu pandemic.
机译:目的:评估工作场所非疫苗隔离措施对甲型H1N1流感大流行的有效性。方法:设计是在两家兄弟公司(同类群组1 n = 6,634,同类群组2 n = 8,500)中进行的准集群随机对照试验。随访时间为2009年7月1日至2010年2月19日(233天)。如果家庭患上了像流感(ILI)这样的流感,干预措施是自愿的,要全薪在家中等待。通过Cox回归模型和log-rank检验比较了两个队列中甲型H1N1流感及其家庭获得ILI的亚组的发生率。结果:每个队列中有189名和270名工人在随访期间感染了H1N1病毒。在此期间,第1组的317名工人被要求在家中待几天(100%服从)。干预组(队列1)与对照组(队列2)相比,具有统计学上显着的较低风险(对数秩检验p = 0.033),调整年龄后干预的危险比为0.799 [0.658-0.970] ,性别,BMI和吸烟状况。与在家中患有ILI但没有被要求定期工作的工人(990中的77,RR = 2.17 [1.48-3.18])相比,被要求在家中等待的工人表现出H1N1感染的频率更高(317人中有49人)。 ])。结论:在日本,一个流感季节,在工作场所等待全薪政策将甲型H1N1流感的总体风险降低了约20%。这种非疫苗措施将是工作场所控制下一次流感大流行的有希望的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号