首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene >The influence of common area lead hazards and lead hazard control on dust lead loadings in multiunit buildings.
【24h】

The influence of common area lead hazards and lead hazard control on dust lead loadings in multiunit buildings.

机译:公共区域铅危害和铅危害控制对多单元建筑物中粉尘铅负荷的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Owners of multiunit buildings built before 1978 that have interior common areas, and who receive certain forms of federal assistance are generally required to address lead-based paint hazards in those common areas. This study examines the relationships between common area paint and dust lead levels and the floor dust lead loadings in associated dwelling units, as well as the effects of lead hazard control treatments in common areas. This article presents data from common areas in 145 low-income, mostly pre-1940, multiunit buildings with 342 associated dwellings in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Lead Hazard Control Grant Program at preintervention, clearance, and 1-year postintervention. Interior common areas in these multiunit buildings were not as well maintained as the dwellings in the buildings. At preintervention, a higher percent of the interior common areas had non-intact, lead-based paint on windows, doors and trim, and other interior components than in associated dwellings(95% versus 85%; 78% versus 67%; and 85% versus 62%). Common areas had preintervention entry and interior (i.e., nonentry) floor dust lead loadings more than four times higher than in dwelling units (128 versus 30 micro g/ft(2); 130 versus 28 micro g/ft(2)) while 1-year postintervention common area dust lead loadings are four to six times that of dwelling dust lead loadings (41 versus 11 micro g/ft(2); 44 versus 8 micro g/ft(2)). Windowsill dust lead loadings in common areas were twice the loadings in dwelling units at preintervention and 1-year postintervention (756 versus 383 mu g/ft(2); 154 versus 68 micro g/ft(2)). Interior common area treatments reduced geometric mean common entry dust lead loadings 71% from preintervention to clearance, and maintained those reduced levels from clearance to 1-year postintervention. Higher level interventions were not more effective than low-level interventions in reducing preintervention levels to clearance or 1-year postintervention. This study demonstrates that interior common areas in the multiunit buildings examined contain substantial amounts of deteriorated lead-based paint and dust. Remediation of common areas can effectively reduce those hazards.
机译:通常要求拥有1978年以前建造的具有内部公共区域的多单元建筑物的所有者,并获得某些形式的联邦援助,以解决这些公共区域中铅基油漆的危害。这项研究检查了公共区域油漆和粉尘铅含量与相关住宅单元中地板粉尘铅含量之间的关系,以及公共区域铅危害控制措施的效果。本文介绍了美国住房和城市发展部首席危害控制拨款计划中干预前,清除和干预后1年的145个低收入,多为1940年以前的多单元建筑物(共342户相关住宅)的公共区域数据。这些多单元建筑物的内部公共区域维护得不如建筑物中的住宅。进行预干预时,与相关住宅相比,在窗户,门,装饰条和其他内部组件上有较高百分比的内部公共区域具有不完整的含铅涂料(95%对85%; 78%对67%; 85 %和62%)。公用区域的干预前进入和内部(即,非进入)地板的粉尘铅负荷比住宅单元高出四倍(128对30 micro g / ft(2); 130对28 micro g / ft(2)),而1干预后一年的公共区域粉尘铅载量是住宅粉尘铅载量的四到六倍(41对11 micro g / ft(2); 44对8 micro g / ft(2))。普通区域的窗台尘铅载量是干预前和干预后1年住所单元载量的两倍(756对383μg / ft(2); 154对68 micro g / ft(2))。内部公共区域的处理从干预前到清除减少了几何平均公共入口尘埃铅负荷71%,并保持了从清除到干预后1年的减少水平。在降低干预前的清除率或干预后的1年时,高级别的干预措施没有比低级别的干预措施更有效。这项研究表明,所检查的多单元建筑物的内部公共区域包含大量的劣化的铅基油漆和灰尘。补救公共区域可以有效减少这些危害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号