...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene >The Influence of Arc-Flash and Fire-Resistant Clothing on Thermoregulation during Exercise in the Heat
【24h】

The Influence of Arc-Flash and Fire-Resistant Clothing on Thermoregulation during Exercise in the Heat

机译:高温运动中电弧闪光和耐火服装对体温调节的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We evaluated the effect of arc-flash and fire-resistant (AFR) clothing ensembles (CE) on whole-body heat dissipation during work in the heat. On 10 occasions, 7 males performed four 15-min cycling bouts at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production (400 W) in the heat (35 degrees C), each separated by 15-min of recovery. Whole-body heat loss and metabolic heat production were measured by direct and indirect calorimetry, respectively. Body heat storage was calculated as the temporal summation of heat production and heat loss. Responses were compared in a semi-nude state and while wearing two CE styles: (1) single-piece (coveralls) and (2) two-piece (workpant + long-sleeve shirt). For group 1, there was one non-AFR single-piece CE (CE1(STD)) and three single-piece CE with AFR properties (CE2(AFR), CE3(AFR), CE4(AFR)). For group 2, there was one non-AFR two-piece CE (CE5(STD)) and four two-piece CE with AFR properties (CE6(AFR), CE7(AFR), CE8(AFR), CE9(AFR)). The workpants for CE6(AFR) were not AFR-rated, while a cotton undershirt was also worn for conditions CE8(AFR) and CE9(AFR) and for all single-piece CE. Heat storage for all conditions (CE1(STD): 328 +/- 55, CE2(AFR): 335 +/- 87, CE3(AFR): 309 +/- 95, CE4(AFR): 403 +/- 104, CE5(STD): 253 +/- 78, CE6(AFR): 268 +/- 89, CE7(AFR): 302 +/- 70, CE8(AFR): 360 +/- 36, CE9(AFR): 381 +/- 99 kJ) was greater than the semi-nude state (160 +/- 124 kJ) (all p <= 0.05). No differences were measured between single-piece uniforms (p = 0.273). Among the two-piece uniforms, heat storage was greater for CE8(AFR) and CE9(AFR) relative to CE5(STD) and CE6(AFR) (all p <= 0.05), but not CE7(AFR) (both p > 0.05). Differences between clothing styles were measured such that greater heat storage was observed in both CE1(STD) and CE2-4(AFR) relative to CE5(STD.) Further, heat storage was greater in CE2(AFR) and CE4(AFR) relative to CE6(AFR), while it was greater in CE4(AFR) compared to CE7(AFR). Body heat storage during work in the heat was not influenced by the use of AFR fabrics in the single- or two-piece uniforms albeit less heat was stored in the two-piece uniforms when no undershirt was worn. However, heat storage was comparable between clothing styles when an undershirt was worn with the two-piece uniform.
机译:我们评估了高温工作期间弧闪和耐火(AFR)服装套装(CE)对全身散热的影响。在10次场合下,有7位男性在热量(35摄氏度)下以固定的代谢热产生速率(400瓦)进行了四次15分钟的循环运动,每一次的间隔时间为15分钟。通过直接量热法和间接量热法分别测量全身热量损失和代谢热产生。人体储热计算为热量产生和热量损失的时间总和。在半裸状态和穿着两种CE风格的情况下比较了反应:(1)单件(连体工作服)和(2)两件式(工作服+长袖衬衫)。对于第1组,有一个非AFR单件式CE(CE1(STD))和三个具有AFR特性的单件式CE(CE2(AFR),CE3(AFR),CE4(AFR))。对于第2组,有一个非AFR两件式CE(CE5(STD))和四个具有AFR特性的两件式CE(CE6(AFR),CE7(AFR),CE8(AFR),CE9(AFR)) 。 CE6(AFR)的工作剂未达到AFR等级,同时还为条件CE8(AFR)和CE9(AFR)以及所有单件CE穿着了棉质汗衫。所有条件下的储热(CE1(STD):328 +/- 55,CE2(AFR):335 +/- 87,CE3(AFR):309 +/- 95,CE4(AFR):403 +/- 104, CE5(STD):253 +/- 78,CE6(AFR):268 +/- 89,CE7(AFR):302 +/- 70,CE8(AFR):360 +/- 36,CE9(AFR):381 +/- 99 kJ)大于半裸状态(160 +/- 124 kJ)(所有p <= 0.05)。单件制服之间没有差异(p = 0.273)。在两件式制服中,相对于CE5(STD)和CE6(AFR),CE8(AFR)和CE9(AFR)的热量存储更大(所有p <= 0.05),而不是CE7(AFR)(均p> 0.05)。测量服装样式之间的差异,以便相对于CE5(STD),在CE1(STD)和CE2-4(AFR)中都观察到更大的热量存储。此外,相对于CE5(STD)和CE4(AFR),热量存储更大。与CE6(AFR)相比,CE4(AFR)的含量更高。尽管在没有穿汗衫的情况下,在两件式制服中存储的热量较少,但在单件式或两件式制服中使用AFR织物不会影响人体在热量工作期间的热量存储。但是,当穿着两件式制服的汗衫时,蓄热在服装样式之间是可比的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号