...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Re: Qureshi NS. 2013. Examiners' perceptions of the objective structured clinical examination in colposcopy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 33:188-190
【24h】

Re: Qureshi NS. 2013. Examiners' perceptions of the objective structured clinical examination in colposcopy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 33:188-190

机译:回复:Qureshi NS。 2013。检查员对阴道镜客观结构化临床检查的看法。妇产科杂志33:188-190

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Qureshi (2013) discussed the subject of examiners' perspective of candidates for the British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (BSCCP) certificate and it is interesting and encouraging to see the great response of examiners towards the candidates.Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are an area of great debate in medical education. They are not subject to the rigorous anonymity barrier normally unanimous across other exams. Examiners in the OSCE setting have the potential to favour or bias students unconsciously, due to previous anonymous interaction and familiarity. To that extent, it would be of interest to compare the examiners' perspectives to those of the candidates, and also to see the extent that examiners knew the candidates prior to examination and if this had a result on their 89% satisfaction rate with the candidates.
机译:Qureshi(2013)讨论了英国阴道镜和宫颈病理学协会(BSCCP)证书的考官的考官观点主题,并且有趣且令人鼓舞的是,考官对考生的反应也不错。客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在医学教育中是一个充满争议的领域。在其他考试中,他们通常不受严格的匿名障碍的约束。由于先前的匿名互动和熟悉,在OSCE环境中的考官有可能无意识地偏爱或偏爱学生。在此程度上,比较审查员的观点与应试者的观点,观察应试者在审查前对应试者的了解程度以及是否使他们对应试者的满意度达到89%感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号