...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS drugs >Generic substitution of lamotrigine among medicaid patients with diverse indications: A cohort-crossover study
【24h】

Generic substitution of lamotrigine among medicaid patients with diverse indications: A cohort-crossover study

机译:适应症不同的药物患者中拉莫三嗪的通用替代:一项队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Controversy exists about the safety of substituting generic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Lamotrigine, the prototypical newer AED, is often used for psychiatric and neurological conditions other than epilepsy. The safety of generic substitution of lamotrigine in diverse populations ofAEDusers is unclear. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate potential associations between generic substitution of lamotrigine and adverse consequences in a population of diverse users of this drug. Study Design: This study was a retrospective cohort-crossover design using state Medicaid claims data from July 2006 through June 2009. Methods: Subjects were included in the cohort if they converted from brand to generic lamotrigine and had 2 years of lamotrigine use prior to conversion. The frequency of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations and condition-specific ED visits or hospitalizations were recorded in the 60 days immediately following the conversion to generic lamotrigine, then compared with the incidence of the same events during a randomly selected time period indexed to one of the patient's past refills of branded lamotrigine. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to quantify the association between generic conversion and health services utilization while controlling for changes in lamotrigine dose and concurrent drug use. Results: Of the 616 unique subjects included in this analysis, epilepsy was the most common diagnosis (41%), followed by bipolar disorder (32%), pain (30%) and migraine (18%). Conversion to generic lamotrigine was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of an ED visit (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.97), hospitalization (AOR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.60, 2.50) or condition-specific encounter (AOR 1.75; 95 CI 0.87, 3.51). Conclusions: A statistically significant increase in ED visits, hospitalizations or condition-specific encounters was not observed following the switch from brand to generic lamotrigine, although a type II error cannot be ruled out.
机译:背景:关于替代通用抗癫痫药(AED)的安全性存在争议。拉莫三嗪是一种典型的新型AED,通常用于癫痫以外的精神病和神经疾病。目前尚不清楚在不同的AED使用者群体中拉莫三嗪的通用替代品的安全性。目的:本研究的目的是评估拉莫三嗪的通用替代与该药物不同使用者人群中的不良后果之间的潜在关联。研究设计:该研究是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了2006年7月至2009年6月的州医疗补助声明数据。方法:如果受试者从品牌转化为通用拉莫三嗪并且在转化前使用拉莫三嗪2年,则将其纳入队列。在转换为通用拉莫三嗪后的60天内记录急诊科(ED)的访视,住院和针对特定病情的ED访视或住院的频率,然后将其与随机选出的相同时间段的事件发生率进行比较,以患者过去使用过的拉莫三嗪品牌药之一。在控制拉莫三嗪剂量的变化和同时使用药物的同时,使用多元条件逻辑回归分析来量化通用转化与卫生服务利用之间的关联。结果:在该分析中包括的616名独特受试者中,癫痫是最常见的诊断(41%),其次是躁郁症(32%),疼痛(30%)和偏头痛(18%)。改用普通拉莫三嗪与急诊就诊的机率有统计学意义的显着增加(校正后的机率[AOR] = 1.35; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.92、1.97),住院(AOR = 1.21; 95%CI 0.60、2.50)或特定条件下的遭遇(AOR 1.75; 95 CI 0.87、3.51)。结论:从品牌改为通用拉莫三嗪后,尽管没有排除II型错误,但在ED访视,住院治疗或因病而异的情况上,没有观察到统计学上的显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号