首页> 外文期刊>Clinical psychology review >The puzzle of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: A meta-analysis comparing intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders with child victims
【24h】

The puzzle of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: A meta-analysis comparing intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders with child victims

机译:家族内儿童性虐待的困惑:一项荟萃分析,比较了家族内和家族外罪犯与儿童受害者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Intrafamilial child sexual abuse is a serious social and health problem, yet explanations of sexual offending against children that emphasize antisocial tendencies and atypical sexual interests do not adequately explain intrafamilial offending. In this meta-analysis, we tested other explanations of intrafamilial child sexual abuse by examining 78 independent samples that compared a total of 6605 intrafamilial offenders to a total of 10,573 extrafamilial offenders, in studies disseminated between 1978 and 2013 (Mdn = 2000). Intrafamilial offenders were significantly lower on variables reflecting antisocial tendencies (e.g., criminal history, juvenile delinquency, impulsivity, substance use, and psychopathy) and atypical sexual interests (e.g., pedophilia, other paraphilias, and excessive sexual preoccupation). Contrary to other explanations that have been proposed, intrafamilial offenders scored lower on offense-supportive attitudes and beliefs, emotional congruence with children, and interpersonal deficits; intrafamilial offenders also did not differ from extrafamilial offenders on most indicators of psychopathology. Intrafamilial offenders were, however, more likely to have experienced sexual abuse, family abuse or neglect, and poor parent-child attachments. There were too few studies to examine family dynamics - spousal relationship quality, parent-child victim relationship, and family functioning more generally even though these factors have been frequently mentioned in the clinical and theoretical literatures. Implications for theories of intrafamilial sexual offending, treatment, and future directions for research am discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:家族内儿童性虐待是一个严重的社会和健康问题,然而,针对儿童的性犯罪的解释强调反社会倾向和非典型性利益,并不能充分解释家族内犯罪。在这项荟萃分析中,我们通过检查1978年至2013年之间传播的研究中的78个独立样本,将总共6605个家族内犯罪者与总共10573个家族外犯罪者进行了比较,从而检验了对家族内儿童性虐待的其他解释(Mdn = 2000)。在反映反社会倾向(例如犯罪史,青少年犯罪,冲动,吸毒和精神病)和非典型性利益(例如恋童癖,其他恋友关系和过度性生活)的变量上,家庭内罪犯的比例明显较低。与提出的其他解释相反,家庭内部罪犯在支持犯罪的态度和信念,与儿童的情感相融以及人际交往方面的得分较低。在大多数精神病理学指标上,家族内犯罪者也与家族外犯罪者没有差异。但是,家庭内犯罪者更容易遭受性虐待,家庭虐待或忽视,以及亲子依恋差。尽管临床和理论文献中经常提到这些因素,但很少有研究来研究家庭动态-配偶关系质量,亲子与受害者关系以及家庭功能。讨论了对家族内性犯罪,治疗的理论以及未来研究方向的意义。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号