...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical psychology review >Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:创伤后应激障碍和共病物质使用障碍的心理干预:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Co-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are common, difficult to treat, and associated with poor prognosis. This review aimed to determine the efficacy of individual and group psychological interventions aimed at treating comorbid PTSD and SUD, based on evidence from randomised controlled trials. Our pre-specified primary outcomes were PTSD severity, drug/alcohol use, and treatment completion. We undertook a comprehensive search strategy. Included studies were rated for methodological quality. Available evidence was judged through GRADE. Fourteen studies were included. We found that individual trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural intervention, delivered alongside SUD intervention, was more effective than treatment as usual (TAU)/minimal intervention for PTSD severity post-treatment, and at subsequent follow-up. There was no evidence of an effect for level of drug/alcohol use post-treatment but there was an effect at 5-7 months. Fewer participants completed trauma-focused intervention than TAU. We found little evidence to support the use of individual or group-based non-trauma-focused interventions. All findings were judged as being of low/very low quality. We concluded that there is evidence that individual trauma-focused psychological intervention delivered alongside SUD intervention can reduce PTSD severity, and drug/alcohol use. There is very little evidence to support use of non-trauma-focused individual or group-based interventions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:并存的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和物质使用障碍(SUD)很常见,难以治疗,并且与不良预后相关。这项综述旨在根据随机对照试验的证据,确定旨在治疗合并症PTSD和SUD的个人和团体心理干预的有效性。我们预先指定的主要结局是PTSD严重程度,药物/酒精使用和治疗完成。我们采取了全面的搜索策略。对纳入研究的方法学质量进行了评级。现有证据是通过GRADE进行判断的。包括十四项研究。我们发现,与SUD干预同时进行的以创伤为中心的认知行为干预与PTSD严重程度的后处理及后续随访相比,比平时治疗(TAU)/最小干预更有效。没有证据表明治疗后药物/酒精的使用水平有影响,但在5-7个月时有影响。与TAU相比,完成创伤重点干预的参与者更少。我们发现几乎没有证据支持使用基于个人或群体的非创伤性干预措施。所有发现均被判定为低质量/非常低质量。我们得出的结论是,有证据表明,与SUD干预同时进行的针对个人创伤的心理干预可以降低PTSD的严重程度以及药物/酒精的使用。很少有证据支持使用非创伤性个人或团体干预措施。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号