...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review.
【24h】

Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review.

机译:昏迷或营养状态的脑损伤个体的感觉刺激:Cochrane系统评价的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of sensory stimulation programmes in patients in coma or vegetative state. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized control trials (RCT) and nonrandomized controlled clinical trials (CCT) comparing any type of stimulation programmes with standard rehabilitation in patients in coma or vegetative state. The Injuries Group specialized register, the Cochrane Controlled trial register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCHLIT from 1966 to January 2002 were searched without language restriction. Reference lists of articles were scanned and experts in the area contacted to find other relevant studies. Abstracts and papers found were initially screened by one reviewer. Three reviewers independently identified relevant studies, extracted data and assessed study quality, resolving disagreement by consensus. OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of unconsciousness (including coma and vegetative state) defined as the time between trauma and objective recovery of the ability to respond to verbal commands; level of consciousness, as measured by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS); level of cognitive functioning (LCF); functional outcomes, as measured by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or by Disability Rating Scale; negative effects (e.g. increased intracranial pressure). RESULTS: Three studies (one RCT and two CCTs) with 68 traumatic brain-injured patients in total, most of whom were road accident victims, met the inclusion criteria. The overall methodological quality was poor and studies differed widely in terms of study design and conduct. Moreover, due to the diversity in reporting of outcome measures, a quantitative metanalysis was not possible. None of the three studies provided useful and valid results on outcomes of clinical relevance for coma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicates that there is no reliable evidence to support the effectiveness of multisensory stimulation programmes in patients in coma or the vegetative state.
机译:目的:评估昏迷或营养状态患者的感觉刺激程序的有效性。设计:比较昏迷或营养状态患者的任何类型的刺激程序与标准康复,对随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机对照临床试验(CCT)进行系统评价。检索了1966年至2002年1月的伤害组专门登记册,Cochrane对照试验登记册,EMBASE,MEDLINE,CINAHL,PSYCHLIT,没有语言限制。扫描了参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家以寻找其他相关研究。最初由一名审阅者筛选发现的摘要和论文。三名审稿人独立地确定了相关研究,提取了数据并评估了研究质量,通过共识解决了分歧。观察指标:无意识的持续时间(包括昏迷和植物状态),定义为从创伤到对言语命令作出反应的能力客观恢复之间的时间;意识水平,由格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)衡量;认知功能水平(LCF);通过格拉斯哥成果量表(GOS)或残疾评定量表测量的功能结果;负面影响(例如颅内压升高)。结果:总共有68例脑外伤患者的三项研究(一项RCT和两项CCT)符合纳入标准,其中大多数是交通事故受害者。总体方法学质量很差,研究在研究设计和行为方面存在很大差异。此外,由于结果指标报告的多样性,无法进行定量荟萃分析。这三项研究均未提供关于昏迷患者临床相关结果的有用且有效的结果。结论:该系统评价表明,尚无可靠的证据支持昏迷或营养状态患者的多感觉刺激程序的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号