...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Endovascular therapy for stenosis of the petrous or cavernous portion of the internal carotid artery: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty compared with stent placement.
【24h】

Endovascular therapy for stenosis of the petrous or cavernous portion of the internal carotid artery: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty compared with stent placement.

机译:颈内动脉狭窄或海绵状部分狭窄的血管内治疗:与支架置入相比,经皮腔内血管成形术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECT: The effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent placement for stenosis of the petrous or cavernous portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were compared. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with symptomatic, greater than 60% stenosis of the petrous or cavernous portion of the ICA were treated using PTA or stent placement; 15 were treated with PTA and nine with stent insertion. Initial and follow-up results (> 3 months posttreatment) were compared in each group. Stenotic portions of the ICA were successfully opened in 13 of 15 patients in the PTA group, and in all nine patients in the stent-treated group. In one case in the PTA group stent delivery was attempted; however, the device could not pass through the vessel's tortuous curve, and PTA alone was performed in this case. Postoperatively, the mean stenotic ratio decreased from 72.1 to 29.6% in the PTA group, and from 75.6 to 2.2% in the stent-treated group. In four patients in the PTA group, stenoses greater than 50% were demonstrated on follow-up angiography performed at 3 to 6 months after PTA. In the stent-treated group, no restenosis was encountered, although in one case acute occlusion of the stent occurred; the device was recanalized with PTA and infusion of tissue plasminogen activator. This case was the only one of the 24 in which any neurological deficits related to the endovascular procedure occurred. Stent placement brought a greater gain in diameter than did PTA at the initial and late follow-up period; this gain was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement is more effective than PTA for stenosis of the petrous or cavernous portion of the ICA from the viewpoint of initial and late gain in diameter.
机译:目的:比较经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)和支架置入对颈内动脉狭窄或海绵状部分(ICA)狭窄的影响。方法:对有症状的ICA狭窄或海绵状部分狭窄程度大于60%的24例患者采用PTA或支架置入术治疗。 15例接受PTA治疗,九例接受支架置入。每组比较初始和随访结果(治疗后> 3个月)。在PTA组的15例患者中,有13例成功地打开了ICA的狭窄部分,而在支架治疗组中,所有9例患者中,ICA的狭窄部分均已成功打开。在PTA组的一种情况下,尝试进行支架递送。但是,该设备无法通过血管的曲折曲线,在这种情况下仅执行PTA。术后,PTA组的平均狭窄率从72.1降低到29.6%,支架治疗组的平均狭窄率从75.6降低到2.2%。 PTA组中的四名患者在PTA后3到6个月进行的后续血管造影显示狭窄大于50%。在支架治疗组中,没有发生再狭窄,尽管在一种情况下发生了支架的急性闭塞。用PTA和输注组织纤溶酶原激活剂对设备进行再通。该病例是24例中唯一与血管内手术有关的神经功能缺损的病例。在初始和晚期随访期间,支架置入术比PTA术获得了更大的直径增加。此收益具有统计学意义。结论:从初期和后期的直径增加的角度来看,支架放置比ICA狭窄或海绵状血管狭窄的PTA更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号