...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgery. >Repeat digital subtraction angiography after a negative baseline assessment in nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: A pooled data meta-analysis. A systematic review
【24h】

Repeat digital subtraction angiography after a negative baseline assessment in nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: A pooled data meta-analysis. A systematic review

机译:基线评估为阴性的非中脑前蛛网膜下腔出血后,重复数字减影血管造影:汇总数据荟萃分析。系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Object. A repeat digital subtraction angiography (DSA) study of the cranial vasculature is routinely performed in patients with diffuse nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) after negative baseline CT angiography (CTA) and DSA studies. However, DSA carries a low but substantial risk of neurological complications. Therefore, the authors evaluated the added value of repeat DSA in patients with initial angiographically negative diffuse non-perimesencephalic SAH. Methods. A systematic review of the contemporary literature was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies from January 2000 onward were reviewed since imaging modalities have much improved over the last decade. A pooled analysis was conducted to identify the detection rate of repeat DSA. In addition, the diagnostic yield of repeat DSAs in a prospectively maintained single-center series of 1051 consecutive patients with SAH was added to the analysis. Results. An initial search of the literature yielded 179 studies, 8 of which met the selection criteria. Another 45 patients from the authors' institution were included in the study, providing 368 patients eligible for the pooled analysis. In 37 patients (10.0%, 95% CI 7.4%-13.6%) an aneurysm was detected on repeat DSA. The timing of the repeat DSA varied from 1 to 6 weeks after the initial DSA. The use of 3D techniques was poorly described among these studies, and no direct comparisons between CTA and DSA were made. Conclusions. Repeat DSA is still warranted in patients with a diffuse nonperimesencephalic SAH and negative initial assessment. However, the exact timing of the repeat DSA is subject to debate.
机译:目的。基线CT血管造影(CTA)和DSA阴性后,弥漫性非间质脑蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的患者常规进行颅内血管系统的重复数字减影血管造影(DSA)研究。但是,DSA带来神经系统并发症的风险较低,但风险很大。因此,作者评估了初始血管造影阴性弥漫性非中脑SAH患者重复DSA的附加价值。方法。根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)的说明,对当代文学进行了系统的综述。自2000年1月起对研究进行了回顾,因为在过去的十年中成像方式已大大改善。进行汇总分析以确定重复DSA的检测率。此外,将前瞻性维持的1051名SAH连续患者的单中心系列重复DSA的诊断率纳入分析。结果。对文献的初步搜索产生了179项研究,其中8项符合选择标准。来自研究机构的另外45名患者被纳入研究,提供了368位有资格进行汇总分析的患者。在37例患者中(10.0%,95%CI 7.4%-13.6%),重复DSA检查发现动脉瘤。重复DSA的时间从初始DSA后的1到6周不等。在这些研究中,对3D技术的使用的描述很少,并且CTA和DSA之间没有直接比较。结论。对于弥漫性非中脑SAH且初始评估为阴性的患者,仍需重复进行DSA。但是,重复DSA的确切时间尚有争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号