首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology >Impact of left ventricular function and the extent of ischemia and scar by stress myocardial perfusion imaging on prognosis and therapeutic risk reduction in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: Results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial
【24h】

Impact of left ventricular function and the extent of ischemia and scar by stress myocardial perfusion imaging on prognosis and therapeutic risk reduction in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: Results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial

机译:应激性心肌灌注显像对左心室功能和局部缺血和疤痕程度的影响,对糖尿病冠心病患者的预后和治疗风险的降低:旁路血管成形术血运重建研究2糖尿病(BARI 2D)试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial demonstrated similar long-term clinical effectiveness of revascularization (REV) and intensive medical (MED) therapy. Comparisons of post-intervention ischemic burden have not been explored but are relevant to treatment decisions. This study examined differences in 1-year stress myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) abnormalities by randomized treatment. Methods. MPS was performed in 1,505 patients at 1-year following randomization. MPS images were analyzed (masked to treatment) by a Nuclear Core Laboratory using a quantitative percent (%) of total, ischemic, and scarred myocardium. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relationship between MPS variables and trial endpoints. Results. At 1-year, nearly all REV patients underwent the assigned procedure; while 16% of those randomized to MED received coronary REV. Patients randomized to REV exhibited fewer stress perfusion abnormalities than MED patients (P < .001). CABG patients had more frequent ischemic and scarred myocardium encumbering ≥5% of the myocardium when compared to those receiving PCI. Patients randomized to MED had more extensive ischemia and the median % of the myocardium with perfusion abnormalities was lower following REV (3% vs 9%, P = .01). A total of 59% of REV patients had no inducible ischemia at 1-year compared to 49% of MED patients (P < .001). Within the CABG stratum, those randomized to MED had the greatest rate of ischemic (P = .032) and scarred (P = .017) perfusion abnormalities. At 1-year, more extensive and severe stress myocardial perfusion abnormalities were associated with higher 5-year rates of death and a combined endpoint of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) rates (11.3%, 8.1%, 6.8%, for ≥10%, 5%-9.9%, and 1-4.9% abnormal myocardium at stress, respectively, P < .001). In adjusted models, selected MPS variables were significantly associated with an increased hazard of cardiac death or MI (hazard ratio = 1.11 per 5% increase in abnormal myocardium at stress, P = .004). Conclusions. Patient management strategies that focus on ischemia resolution can be useful to guide the efficacy of near-term therapeutic approaches. A 1-year post-therapeutic intervention myocardial perfusion scan provides important information regarding prognosis in stable CAD patients with diabetes.
机译:背景。旁路血管成形术血运重建研究2糖尿病试验证明了血运重建(REV)和强化医疗(MED)治疗具有相似的长期临床效果。干预后缺血负荷的比较尚未进行探讨,但与治疗决策有关。这项研究通过随机治疗检查了1年应激性心肌灌注SPECT(MPS)异常的差异。方法。随机分组后1年,对1,505例患者进行了MPS。核核心实验室使用总量,局部缺血和瘢痕心肌的定量百分比(%)对MPS图像进行了分析(对处理隐蔽)。考克斯比例风险模型用于估计MPS变量和试验终点之间的关系。结果。在1年时,几乎所有的REV患者都接受了指定的手术。随机分配给MED的患者中有16%接受了冠状动脉REV。与MED患者相比,随机分组接受REV的患者表现出更少的压力灌注异常(P <.001)。与接受PCI的患者相比,CABG患者的心肌缺血和瘢痕形成更为频繁,占心肌的≥5%。随机分组接受MED的患者有更广泛的局部缺血,REV后发生灌注异常的心肌的中位百分比较低(3%比9%,P = 0.01)。总共59%的REV患者在1年时没有可诱发的缺血,而MED患者则为49%(P <.001)。在CABG层中,那些随机分配给MED的患者具有最高的缺血性(P = .032)和疤痕性(P = .017)灌注异常。在1年时,更广泛,更严重的应激性心肌灌注异常与5年死亡率较高以及合并的心源性死亡或心肌梗死(MI)率终点有关(≥10的分别为11.3%,8.1%,6.8%) %,5%-9.9%和1-4.9%的异常心肌在压力下分别为P <.001)。在调整后的模型中,选定的MPS变量与心脏死亡或心梗的危险增加显着相关(在压力下异常心肌增加5%,危险比= 1.11,P = .004)。结论。专注于缺血解决的患者管理策略可用于指导近期治疗方法的有效性。治疗后1年的干预性心肌灌注扫描可提供有关稳定的CAD糖尿病患者预后的重要信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号