首页> 外文期刊>Journal of natural gas science and engineering >Comparison and integration of experimental methods to characterize the full-range pore features of tight gas sandstone-A case study in Songliao Basin of China
【24h】

Comparison and integration of experimental methods to characterize the full-range pore features of tight gas sandstone-A case study in Songliao Basin of China

机译:致密气砂岩全程孔隙特征表征方法的比较与综合-以松辽盆地为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Pore size distribution (PSD) is a crucial parameter for reserve grading and estimating the productivity of tight oil and gas. The various types and scales of pores in tight reservoirs make any quantification of the PSD with a single experiment incomprehensive; instead, the integration of various techniques is required. This paper present's a case study of the Low Cretaceous tight gas sandstone of the Sorigliao Basin in China that compares and integrates various experimental data to uncover the full-range PSD of tight sandstone with different pore ranges. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTNA), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and rate-controlled porosimetry (RCP)/pressure-controlled porosimetry (PCP) were utilized on the same samples with distinctly different permeabilities and clay contents. For tight sand samples with a high clay content; LTNA can reflect 70% + of pores and reveal the presence of ink-bottle-shaped pores, which leads to deviations between PCP and LTNA results for smaller pores (<20 nm). In comparison, NMR can measure large pores (>200 nm) beyond the range of LTNA but underestimates the-volume of very small pores due to the large echo spacing and larger surface relaxivity of samples. For tight sand samples with a low clay content, the LTNA and RCP results are complementary and can reveal similar to 75% of pores. The left peak of RCP is in excellent agreement with the NMR results, but the right peak shows clear deviations from the NMR results and is similar to SEM images, indicating that RCP overestimates the size of large pores. A new approach for characterizing the full-range PSD by combining NMR and LTNA is established, demonstrating that low clay and high clay tight sand samples contain pores in the main ranges of 0.2-20 tm and 10-300 nm, respectively. Pores are divided into three ranges with dividing diameters of 0.5 mu m and 3 gm, corresponding to relatively smaller inter-crystalline pores (ICPs) in clay and calcite, ICPs in clay and quartz, and residual interparticle pores and dissolution pores. Among these, ICPs in clay dominate. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:孔隙尺寸分布(PSD)是储层等级和估算致密油气产量的关键参数。致密储层中各种类型和规模的孔隙使得单个实验的PSD定量分析变得不全面。相反,需要集成各种技术。本文以中国索里格里盆地低白垩纪致密气砂岩为例,比较和综合了各种实验数据,揭示了不同孔隙范围的致密砂岩的全程PSD。扫描电子显微镜(SEM),低温氮吸附(LTNA),核磁共振(NMR)和速率控制孔隙率(RCP)/压力控制孔隙率(PCP)用于具有明显不同的渗透率和粘土含量。用于高粘土含量的致密砂样品; LTNA可以反射70%以上的孔,并显示出墨水瓶状孔的存在,这会导致PCP和LTNA结果之间出现偏差(较小的孔(<20 nm))。相比之下,NMR可以测量超出LTNA范围的大孔(> 200 nm),但由于样品的回声间隔大和表面弛豫性大,因此低估了非常小的孔的体积。对于低粘土含量的致密砂样品,LTNA和RCP结果是互补的,并且可以显示接近75%的孔隙。 RCP的左峰与NMR结果非常吻合,但是右峰显示出与NMR结果明显的偏差,并且与SEM图像相似,表明RCP高估了大孔的大小。建立了一种通过结合NMR和LTNA表征全范围PSD的新方法,证明了低粘土和高粘土致密砂样品的孔分别在0.2-20 tm和10-300 nm的主要范围内。孔分为三个范围,划分直径分别为0.5μm和3 gm,分别对应于粘土和方解石中较小的晶间孔(ICPs),粘土和石英中的ICPs以及残留的颗粒间孔和溶解孔。其中,粘土中的ICP占主导。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号